As expected, the Federal Reserve raised short-term interest rates by 25 basis points at its May 2-3 meeting. With the rate hike, the upper bound of the federal funds rate target is now 5.25%, the same level as the peak of the last cycle in 2006-2007.
The federal funds rate is at the highest point since 2007
Source: Bloomberg, daily data as of 5/9/2023
Federal Funds Target Rate – Upper Bound (FDTR Index). The federal funds rate is a target interest rate set by the central bank in its efforts to influence short-term interest rates as part of its monetary policy strategy.
In the statement released after the meeting, the Fed hinted that its aggressive rate-hiking cycle is on hold as it assesses the outlook for growth and inflation, but left the door open to further tightening, citing ongoing high inflation as its primary concern. While the Fed may not be certain about its next move, the market is pricing in the likelihood of two rate cuts of 25 basis points1 each later in the year.
Notably, this divergence between the Fed's forecasts and the market's expectations has persisted even as the rate hikes have continued over the past few months. Consequently, the yield curve has been steeply inverted for the past nine months—a sign that investors expect lower interest rates in the future—which historically has been a fairly reliable indicator of a coming recession.
An inverted yield curve has preceded every recession since 1977
Source: Bloomberg, daily data as of 5/9/2023
Market Matrix US Sell 2 Year & Buy 10 Year Bond Yield Spread (USCY2Y10 INDEX). Note: The rates are comprised of Market Matrix U.S. Generic spread rates (USYC2Y10). This spread is a calculated Bloomberg yield spread that replicate selling the current 2-year U.S. Treasury Note and buying the current 10-year U.S. Treasury Note, then factoring the differences by 100.
In our view, the evidence suggests that the Fed's tightening has gone far enough to bring inflation down in the longer term. The next move will likely be a cut in rates rather than a hike. The timing is unclear, with the Fed indicating it is likely to hold rates at the current level this year, but it all depends on inflation. We would not rule out a rate cut as early as the third of fourth quarter of the year. Here are the three major reasons:
1. Lagged impact of rate hikes is starting to show softening growth and inflation. Central bankers often remark that monetary policy works with a lag, and it takes time for tighter monetary policy to bring down inflation. Recent economic indicators indicate that the effects are beginning to show up. In fact, the Fed's research staff is forecasting a "mild recession starting later this year, with a recovery over the subsequent two years." 2
Leading indicators suggest the same. They have been falling for over a year. While the Fed has been focusing on coincident or lagging indicators, such as the unemployment rate, in setting policy, the market is looking forward. Now it looks as if the Fed is catching up.
The Conference Board Leading Economic Index has declined
Source: Bloomberg, monthly data as of 4/30/2023
Conference Board U.S. Leading Economic Index YoY (LEI YOY Index) and GDP U.S. Chained Dollars YoY (GDP CYOY Index). The Conference Board Leading Economic Index is designed to anticipate turning points in the business cycle by about seven months. The 10 components it measures include average weekly hours in manufacturing, average weekly initial claims for unemployment insurance and manufacturers' new orders for consumer goods and materials.
Inflation has been easing as well, especially at the wholesale level. The producer price index (PPI) has been falling sharply as the supply of goods has caught up with demand. After spiking during the pandemic, producer prices are now growing at only 2.7%, consistent with the long-term average.
Producer prices index: Final Demand has declined
Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, monthly data as of 3/31/2023
U.S. PPI Final Demand (FDIUFDYO Index). Notes: Producer prices (output) are a measure of the change in the price of goods as they leave their place of production (i.e. prices received by domestic producers for their outputs either on the domestic or foreign market).
While inflation in the service sector has been slower to fall than at the wholesale level, it is receding. The New York Fed model shown below indicates that core inflation (excluding food and energy prices, which tend to swing up and down) is trending steadily lower and is lower than the more widely known core personal consumption expenditures (PCE) index.
Inflation persistence continues to decline
Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, monthly data as of 3/31/2023.
Headline PCE: PCE is Personal Consumption Expenditures Chain Type Price Index YoY and (PCE DEFY Index) and Core PCE: Core Personal Consumption Expenditures Chain Type Price Index YoY (PCE CYOY Index).
Notes: The Federal Reserve Bank of New York Multivariate Core Trend (MCT) is a dynamic factor model estimated on monthly data for the seventeen major sectors of the PCE price index. It decomposes each sector's inflation as the sum of a common trend, a sector-specific trend, a common transitory shock, and a sector-specific transitory shock. The trend in PCE inflation is constructed as the sum of the common and the sector-specific trends weighted by the expenditure shares.
2. Credit conditions are tightening. Since monetary policy is transmitted through the financial system, the recent turmoil in the banking sector suggests that credit conditions will likely tighten further. In fact, the recent turmoil in the banking system may be a signal that policy is already too tight.
The Fed's quarterly Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey indicates that banks were pulling back on lending even before the recent failure of several banks. Given worries about potential outflows of deposits, lenders are likely to become even more cautious. Regional banks are the major lenders to small- and medium-size businesses as well as to the commercial real estate sector.
More loan officers report tightening standards for consumer loans
Source: Bloomberg. Quarterly data as of April 2023
Federal Reserve's Senior Loan Officer Survey: Net Percentage of Domestic Respondents Reporting Tightening Standards for Consumer Loans to Large and Middle-Market Firms (SLDETIGT Index) and Tightening Standards for Consumer Loans to Small Firms (SLDETGTS Index).
Meanwhile, demand for consumer loans has declined
Source: Bloomberg, quarterly data as of April 2023
Federal Reserve's Senior Loan Officer Survey: Net Percentage of Domestic Respondents Reporting Demand for Consumer Loans to Large and Middle-Market Firms (SLDEDEMD Index Index) and Demand for Consumer Loans to Small Firms (SLDDEDEMS Index).
Credit tightening has been less evident in the corporate bond market, where yield spreads versus Treasuries are holding near long-term averages. However, in the private credit markets, there are reports of significant tightening in the availability of capital. These loans are often short-term with floating rates, resulting in sharply higher refinancing costs.
3. Debt ceiling debate. Finally, the standoff between Congress and the White House over raising the debt ceiling is likely to increase volatility in financial markets and may result in slower economic growth. While our base case is not for a default on the U.S. debt, even the threat of it is elevating volatility in the financial markets.
Yields for short-term Treasuries maturing in the next few months are elevated compared to those maturing in the third quarter, as investors shy away from the risk that the interest on T-bills could be deferred. The standoff has heightened the uncertainty about the economy. A default would risk sending short-term yields higher, while risk assets and the dollar would likely fall. This is the scenario that played out in the 2011 debt ceiling fight, which resulted in the U.S. federal government credit rating being downgraded by several rating agencies, including Standard & Poor's, to below AAA for the first time ever.
Even assuming that there is a deal that raises the debt ceiling in the near term, it looks likely that there will be wrangling over fiscal policy in the fall budget season. Fiscal policy has already moved from stimulative to restrictive. The Hutchins Center Fiscal Impact Measure estimates that fiscal tightening subtracted about 0.2% from gross domestic product (GDP) growth in Q1 2023, as transfer payments from state and local governments to households declined. Further fiscal tightening, coming on the heels of tighter monetary policy, could exacerbate a downturn.
The contribution of fiscal policy to real GDP growth
Source: Brookings, Bureau of Economic Analysis (historical) and the Congressional Budget Office (projections). Quarterly data as of Q1 2023. Projections begin Q2 2023.
Notes: The Hutchins Center Fiscal Impact Measure shows how much local, state, and federal tax and spending policy adds to or subtracts from overall economic growth and provides a near-term forecast of fiscal policies' effects on economic activity. When fiscal impact is positive, the government is contributing to GDP growth. When fiscal impact is negative, government is subtracting from GDP growth. Gray shading indicates past recessions.
Implications for interest rates
The combination of tightening monetary to date, the waning impact of fiscal stimulus, combined with the risks around the debt ceiling debate point to the likelihood that the Fed won't have much reason or scope to hike interest rates further in this cycle. Moreover, we wouldn't be surprised by one or two rate cuts later this year.
Given that outlook, we continue to look for intermediate- to long-term Treasury yields to remain low. They have already fallen sharply from the peak levels of late last year, but there is some scope for further decline. Consequently, we continue to suggest that investors add some duration to portfolios.
1 A basis point is one-hundredth of 1 percentage point, or 0.01%, so 25 basis points would be equal to 0.25%.
2 Source: Federal Reserve, "Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee, March 21–22, 2023," page 6.
The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The investment strategies mentioned here may not be suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decision.
All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market conditions. Data contained herein from third-party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed.
Examples provided are for illustrative purposes only and not intended to be reflective of results you can expect to achieve.
Investing involves risk including loss of principal.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results and the opinions presented cannot be viewed as an indicator of future performance.
Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs and expenses and cannot be invested in directly. For more information on indexes please see schwab.com/indexdefinitions.
Fixed income securities are subject to increased loss of principal during periods of rising interest rates. Fixed-income investments are subject to various other risks including changes in credit quality, market valuations, liquidity, prepayments, early redemption, corporate events, tax ramifications and other factors. Lower-rated securities are subject to greater credit risk, default risk, and liquidity risk.
The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and is not intended to be a substitute for specific individualized tax, legal or investment planning advice. Where specific advice is necessary or appropriate, consult with a qualified tax advisor, CPA, financial planner or investment manager.
The policy analysis provided by the Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., does not constitute and should not be interpreted as an endorsement of any political party.
The Schwab Center for Financial Research is a division of Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.0523-39US