Loading navigation

3 Ways to Build an All-ETF Portfolio

An index-ETF-only portfolio can be a straightforward yet flexible investment solution. We discuss three different approaches to building one.
June 4, 2026Michael Iachini

Key takeaways

  • Given the breadth of the index ETF market, it's possible to build a complete portfolio using only this class of funds.
  • Index ETFs appeal to many investors because they generally have low ongoing costs and it's easy to see what they hold because they track indexes.
  • But choosing only index ETFs involves some trade-offs, including giving up active management and the chance to tailor every holding the way you might with individual stocks and bonds.
  • Investors can build an all-ETF portfolio in different ways, from a very simple two-fund approach to a more customized mix of specialized ETFs.
  • Adding more ETFs can offer greater control and broader exposure to different markets, but it can also make your portfolio harder to manage and increase trading costs.
  • Whatever approach you choose, it's important to review your holdings regularly and watch for overlapping funds that may look different but own many of the same investments.

There are plenty of advantages in using exchange-traded funds (ETFs) to fill gaps in an investment portfolio, and lots of investors mix and match ETFs with mutual funds and individual stocks and bonds in their accounts. But it's equally possible to build a complete portfolio out of nothing but ETFs, which in most cases track indexes for a variety of asset classes. In this article, we'll discuss the benefits and trade-offs of an ETF-only portfolio using index ETFs. (While actively managed ETFs do exist, in this article an "all-ETF portfolio" refers specifically to using index ETFs only.)

How can you tell if an all-ETF portfolio makes sense for you? For the most part, it comes down to your goals and preferences. As a general rule, ETFs provide excellent diversification at a low annual operating expense ratio (OER), since many are passive funds that track a certain benchmark index. Because of this, they typically offer transparency—it's easy to see what stocks, bonds, or other investments the ETF holds each day. If these are top characteristics you look for in your investments, owning nothing but ETFs may be a straightforward yet flexible solution worth a closer look.

However, there are some trade-offs to think through. An all-ETF portfolio means giving up actively managed mutual funds, which have the potential to outperform index ETFs through professional selection of stocks and bonds. You'll also leave behind the control that comes with a portfolio composed solely of individual securities you have selected. Some people won't want to give these things up, even though these approaches have specific disadvantages as well (see the table below). You'll also need to be comfortable with the risks that come with any ETF, including market risk and liquidity risk, as well as the expenses of the ETFs.

A portfolio of index mutual funds, meanwhile, would be very similar to an all-ETF portfolio with two main exceptions: ETFs trade differently than index mutual funds, and for certain niche asset classes, you might be able to find ETFs but few or no index mutual funds.

Some pros and cons of four types of portfolios relative to each other

PortfolioProsCons
Actively managed mutual funds
  • Professional active management
  • Potential to outperform the market
  • Diversified well among various securities
  • Largest number of fund choices
  • Higher ongoing expenses
  • Possible underperformance
  • Least transparent
  • Higher portfolio turnover
Index mutual funds
  • Diversified very well among various securities
  • Generally low ongoing expense
  • Seeks to match index performance (minus fees and expenses)
  • Limited selection in certain asset classes
  • No active management
  • No potential to beat the index
All-Index ETF portfolio
  • Diversified very well among various securities
  • Generally low ongoing expenses
  • Niche options available if desired
  • Transparency on a daily basis into the makeup of the fund
  • Trading flexibility
  • Seeks to match index performance (minus fees and expenses)
  • No active management
  • No potential to beat the index
Individual stocks and bonds
  • No ongoing management expenses
  • Maximum control
  • Complete transparency (because you are picking the stocks and bonds)
  • Higher transaction costs
  • Diversification can be more difficult
  • No professional management
  • Certain types of bonds may have low liquidity (for individual bonds)

If you think an all-ETF portfolio might suit you, here are three ways to build one, ranging from ultra-simple to very fine-tuned.

Considering ETFs for your portfolio?

1. Keeping it simple

One option to consider is using two ETFs to help provide a balanced, diversified portfolio of stocks and bonds:

  • A total world stock market ETF
  • A total bond market ETF

Want to browse for ETFs? You can use Schwab's ETF screener to find lots of options.

For instance, if you're an investor seeking moderate risk and decide that you want 60% of your portfolio in stocks and 40% in bonds, you could consider purchasing an all-country stock index ETF and then combine it with a bond ETF.

World stock market ETFs might track an index like the Morgan Stanley Capital International All Country World (MSCI ACWI) IndexSM, which provides exposure to US stocks, developed-market international stocks, and emerging-market international stocks.

For bonds, some ETFs track the broad Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, which covers:

  • Treasury bonds
  • Government-agency bonds
  • Mortgage-backed bonds
  • Investment-grade corporate bonds
  • Some dollar-denominated international bonds

The advantage of this type of portfolio is its simplicity: one stock fund paired with one bond fund. It will be easy to see when you need to rebalance, since both allocations should add up to 100%. And, because ETFs trade like stocks—that is, intraday with a bid/ask spread—a two-ETF portfolio can help keep your trading costs low.1

One disadvantage of this portfolio is that it's not very fine-tuned. For instance, as of April 30, 2026, MSCI ACWI Index had 63.4% in US stocks and 36.6% in non-US stocks, according to Morgan Stanley Capital International. If you prefer to have a larger allocation to US stocks, for example, you might opt for two separate stock ETFs and then adjust the weighting of the two to get your preferred allocation.

Another drawback to this portfolio is that it lacks any allocation to Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS), sub-investment grade bonds (also known as "high yield" or "junk bonds"), and non-dollar-denominated international bonds, not to mention other asset classes such as commodities and real estate. Additional asset classes can help further diversify your portfolio. Still, if simplicity is what you seek, the two-ETF portfolio might be an option worth considering.

2. Middle of the road

An intermediate approach to an all-ETF portfolio could consist of about eight ETFs.

For stocks, you could have:

  • A large-cap US ETF
  • A small-cap US ETF
  • An international developed-market ETF
  • An emerging-market ETF

For bonds, you could start with the same core bond ETF described above and diversify further by adding three additional ETFs to have:

  • A total bond market ETF
  • A TIPS ETF
  • A sub-investment grade ("high-yield" or "junk") bond ETF
  • An international bond ETF

The advantage of this portfolio is that it can help provide balance. It has enough ETFs to give you coverage of more asset classes and the ability to adjust your portfolio weights in most areas, but not so many funds that it becomes too challenging to manage. The disadvantage of this portfolio is that it offers neither maximum simplicity nor maximum customizability.

3. Fine-tuned

On the other end of the spectrum is a fine-tuned portfolio with 20 or more ETFs. This type of portfolio can make sense for investors who like to allocate their accounts toward exactly the parts of the market they expect to perform best.

This portfolio begins similarly to the middle-of-the-road ETF portfolio but then divides the various parts into thinner slices:

  • US large-cap stocks can be divided into sectors such as financials and health care, or even narrower industries such as banks and biotech.
  • The US stock allocation can further be divided to include mid-cap or micro-cap stocks, or styles such as growth and value.
  • The international stock allocation can be adjusted to include international small-cap stocks, or regions such as Europe and Asia, or even individual countries like Germany and China.

The core bond index can be broken into its components:

  • Treasuries
  • Agency-backed bonds
  • Mortgage-backed securities
  • Corporate bonds

The average maturity of the bonds in the portfolio can be fine-tuned to include more long-term bonds or short-term bonds.

Commodity ETFs can also be added to the portfolio, and split into fine slices such as:

  • Oil
  • Gold and other precious metals
  • Agricultural commodities
  • Base metals

Real estate ETFs can be added to the portfolio and could even be split into US and global.

With the fine-tuned portfolio, it's unlikely that you would want to hold every possible ETF at the same time. For instance, rather than holding allocations to all 11 stock sectors and every individual country possible, you would likely have core allocations to certain ETFs and then add weight to the ETFs representing only those sectors or countries that appear most attractive to you.

The advantage of this portfolio is the ability to get almost exactly the exposure you want to each narrow piece of the market while still enjoying the diversification that ETFs offer over individual stocks and bonds.

The disadvantages are complexity and trading costs. With so many ETFs in the portfolio, you would need to carefully keep track of what you own at all times. You could easily lose sight of your total allocation to stocks if you hold 13 different stock ETFs instead of one or even five. In addition, with so many ETFs in the portfolio and relatively more buying and selling, the impact of bid-ask spreads could add up quickly.

Beware of overlapping ETFs

However you decide to build your portfolio—but especially if you expand beyond something like the two-fund option—you should be mindful of overlapping or duplicate assets in different funds. For example, when selecting an index ETF that provides exposure to US stocks, you might find a few possible options that seem to offer different approaches and that have slightly different performance, and, unable to decide between them, you might opt to put both in your portfolio. But if they both track the same index and as a result hold virtually the same stocks, you might be getting only the illusion of diversification from holding both funds. To avoid this issue, consider using a comparison tool for ETFs (or mutual funds, if you opt for those) to help identify funds that are redundant in their holdings or investment styles.

Want to compare multiple ETFs and see how they stack up? Use our compare tool

Bottom line: Don't set it and forget it

After you settle on a portfolio, your work isn't done. Allocating your portfolio among different investments—whether they are all ETFs or a mix of investment types—shouldn't be a one-and-done activity. It's a good practice to check on your allocation at least annually and maybe quarterly. Asset allocation is about finding a blend of investments that aligns with your current financial situation and supports with your long-term goals, and those can shift over time. And if you have questions along the way, consider consulting a financial professional to help you evaluate your options.

1 ETF shares are sold at one price (the "ask") and bought at a lower price (the "bid"). Whenever you trade, you're generally losing half of the bid/ask spread, since you either buy at the higher ask price or sell at the lower bid price.

Considering ETFs for your portfolio?

This material is intended for general informational and educational purposes only. This should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The investment strategies mentioned are not suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decisions.

All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market, economic or political conditions. Data contained herein from third party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed.

For illustrative purposes only. Individual situations will vary. Not intended to be reflective of results you can expect to achieve. All names and market data shown are for illustrative purposes only and are not a recommendation, offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security.

Investing involves risk, including loss of principal.

Fixed income securities are subject to increased loss of principal during periods of rising interest rates. Fixed income investments are subject to various other risks including changes in credit quality, market valuations, liquidity, prepayments, early redemption, corporate events, tax ramifications, and other factors. Lower rated securities are subject to greater credit risk, default risk, and liquidity risk.

High-yield securities and unrated securities of similar credit quality (junk bonds) are subject to greater levels of credit and liquidity risks and may be more volatile than higher-rated securities. High-yield securities are considered predominately speculative with respect to the issuer's continuing ability to make principal and interest payments.

International investments involve additional risks, which include differences in financial accounting standards, currency fluctuations, geopolitical risk, foreign taxes and regulations, and the potential for illiquid markets. Investing in emerging markets may accentuate this risk.

Emerging Markets Risk. Emerging market countries may be more likely to experience political turmoil or rapid changes in market or economic conditions than more developed countries. Such countries often have less uniformity in accounting and reporting requirements and greater risk associated with the custody of securities. In addition, the financial stability of issuers (including governments) in emerging market countries may be more precarious than in other countries. As a result, there will tend to be an increased risk of price volatility associated with the fund's investments in emerging market countries and, at times, it may be difficult to value such investments.

Diversification and asset allocation strategies do not ensure a profit and do not protect against losses in declining markets.

Rebalancing does not protect against losses or guarantee that an investor's goal will be met. Rebalancing may cause investors to incur transaction costs and, when a non-retirement account is rebalanced, taxable events may be created that may affect your tax liability.

A sector fund focuses on companies in a specific sector and may involve a greater degree of risk than an investment in funds with broader diversification.

Some specialized exchange-traded funds can be subject to additional market risks.

Investment returns will fluctuate and are subject to market volatility, so that an investor's shares, when redeemed or sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Shares of ETFs are not individually redeemable directly with the ETF. Shares of ETFs are bought and sold at market price, which may be higher or lower than the net asset value (NAV).

Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) are inflation-linked securities issued by the US Government whose principal value is adjusted periodically in accordance with the rise and fall in the inflation rate. Thus, the dividend amount payable is also impacted by variations in the inflation rate, as it is based upon the principal value of the bond. It may fluctuate up or down. Repayment at maturity is guaranteed by the US Government and may be adjusted for inflation to become the greater of the original face amount at issuance or that face amount plus an adjustment for inflation. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities are guaranteed by the US Government, but inflation-protected bond funds do not provide such a guarantee.

Mortgage-backed securities (MBS) may be more sensitive to interest rate changes than other fixed income investments. They are subject to extension risk, where borrowers extend the duration of their mortgages as interest rates rise, and prepayment risk, where borrowers pay off their mortgages earlier as interest rates fall. These risks may reduce returns.

Small-cap stocks or funds are subject to greater volatility than those in other asset categories.

Small-Cap Company Risk. Small-cap companies may be more vulnerable to adverse business or economic events than larger, more established companies and their securities may be riskier than those issued by larger companies. The value of securities issued by small-cap companies may be based in substantial part on future expectations rather than current achievements and their prices may move sharply, especially during market upturns and downturns. In addition, small-cap companies may have limited financial resources, management experience, product lines and markets, and their securities may trade less frequently and in more limited volumes than the securities of larger companies. Further, small-cap companies may have less publicly available information and such information may be inaccurate or incomplete.

Commodity-related products, including futures, carry a high level of risk and are not suitable for all investors. Commodity-related products may be extremely volatile, illiquid and can be significantly affected by underlying commodity prices, world events, import controls, worldwide competition, government regulations, and economic conditions, regardless of the length of time shares are held. Investments in commodity-related products may subject the fund to significantly greater volatility than investments in traditional securities and involve substantial risks, including risk of loss of a significant portion of their principal value. Commodity-related products are also subject to unique tax implications such as additional tax forms and potentially higher tax rates on certain ETFs.

This information is not a specific recommendation, individualized tax, legal, or investment advice. Tax laws are subject to change, either prospectively or retroactively. Where specific advice is necessary or appropriate, individuals should contact their own professional tax and investment advisors or other professionals (CPA, Financial Planner, Investment Manager, Estate Attorney) to help answer questions about specific situations or needs prior to taking any action based upon this information. Certain information presented herein may be subject to change. The information or material contained in this document may not be copied, assigned, transferred, disclosed or utilized without the express written approval of Schwab.

Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs, and expenses, and cannot be invested in directly. For more information on indexes, please see schwab.com/indexdefinitions.

The Schwab Center for Financial Research is a division of Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

0526-LBJ0