How Thematic Strategies Differ from Sector Funds

Part of the appeal of thematic investment strategies is that they can venture beyond traditional sector classifications when bundling stocks, potentially giving you new ways to diversify.
Here we'll take a closer look at how themes and sectors differ, and how thematic strategies can give you a targeted exposure to different parts of the economy.
Sector classifications
Let's start with sectors, since those are perhaps the more familiar of the two.
Standard & Poor's and MSCI created the modern system for grouping and classifying stocks by industrial sector when they launched the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS®) back in 1999. Under this framework, companies are sorted into one of 11 sectors according to their principal business activity—consumer discretionary, communication services, consumer staples, energy, financials, health care, industrials, information technology, materials, real estate, or utilities—as determined by revenue sources and other factors. Each sector also contains subdivisions for industry group, industry, and sub-industry. Every company within a sector is assigned one classification in each of those tiers.
Standardized sector and industry definitions paved the way for investing strategies such as sector-focused exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Such funds can be useful if you expect a certain sector to do better—or worse—than the rest of the economy over a given period.
Because they can include all the stocks in a sector, sector ETFs can offer a measure of diversification beyond what you might get if you'd invested in just a handful of stocks.
Interested in stock investing?
Thematic classifications
Like sectors, thematic strategies also group together companies and slices of the economy, but they have a different way of doing so. They may target ideas or trends—especially new or potentially transformative technology or social forces—that don't fit squarely into the existing classifications.
As a result, thematic strategies can be both more targeted than sector-based ones, at least insofar as they focus on a particular idea or trend, and more broad-based, because they can consider stocks from any industry or sector, so long as they are relevant or consistent with the theme. Additionally, a stock can be relevant to any number of themes, whereas it will only ever belong to one sector. Finally, sector designations tend to be backward-looking, since they depend on a company's current or past business activity, while thematic strategies can focus on a business's potential future business opportunities.
Of course, thematic relevance is somewhat subjective. Themes don't have recourse to a GICS equivalent to arbitrate differences between investment offerings or determine which ones should be included where. Every strategy will reflect the views of the research provider, so be sure you do your research before deploying a thematic strategy.
Sectors vs. themes
Here are some examples to clarify these differences. The chart below shows four technology-oriented Schwab Investing Themes™: artificial intelligence, big data, cloud computing, and cyber security. As you can see, each theme starts with a heavy dollop of stocks from the information technology sector but then diverge.
Different shades of tech

Source: Schwab theme allocations as of 07/31/2026. For illustrative purposes only.
For example, the artificial intelligence theme includes a large contingent of information technology companies, but the rest come from the communication services, industrials, and healthcare sectors. The cyber security theme, on the other hand, draws almost entirely from information technology stocks.
Themes concentrated within a single sector can also differ significantly from funds tracking those sectors by virtue of what they exclude. Consider the example of Schwab's U.S. housing theme.
Building a theme

Source: Schwab theme allocations as of 07/31/2026. For illustrative purposes only.
You might expect a housing-focused theme to include quite a few real estate companies, but real estate accounts for less than 9%. Consumer discretionary stocks, with a more than 74% weighting, are the largest sector in this theme—as large homebuilders such as DR Horton and Lennar Corp reside there. Financials, including some mortgage and titling companies, make up the remaining 17%.
To be sure, these are just a few examples from Schwab's offerings. Other providers' thematic strategies might pursue similar goals with totally different holdings or sector concentrations, depending on their models and research.
No matter how a thematic strategy allocates, it's probably still going to look different from even superficially similar sector-focused alternatives. And such differences can be the building blocks of additional diversification.
Making themes work
Of course, diversification only makes sense in the context of your portfolio. Thematic strategies on their own won't give you a diversified portfolio, so it's essential to determine how one might work with the rest of your holdings—especially if you rely on funds tracking market-cap weighted indexes.
Such funds can automatically provide a lot of exposure to certain large companies, so employing a thematic strategy that increases your exposure to those companies could make your portfolio less diverse. Similarly, there's no rule preventing a particular stock from appearing in multiple themes, be sure to review the list of stocks in a theme before you invest.
That said, how you're investing matters. If you're using a thematic fund, you might not have any say over what stocks are included. If you're using a theme-based stock list, though, you may be able to exclude certain companies to avoid unwanted concentration.
Thematic strategies can help you explore otherwise untapped parts of the market and add a new dimension to your portfolio—but only if you use them correctly.
Interested in stock investing?
Explore more topics
Please read the Schwab Investing Themes™ Terms and Conditions.
Quotes may be delayed. Please check a real-time quote for current information.
Data provided by multiple sources, including third parties. While Schwab believes such third-party information is reliable, we do not guarantee its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness.
Investment Research for Schwab Investing Themes™ is provided by Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc. ("CSIM"). CSIM is an affiliate of Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. ("Schwab"). Both CSIM and Schwab are separate entities and subsidiaries of The Charles Schwab Corporation.
Schwab Investing Themes is for informational purposes only; it is not intended to be investment advice (including fiduciary advice as defined under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act or the Internal Revenue Code) or a recommendation of any stock.
Investing in stocks can be volatile and involves risk, including loss of principal. Consider your individual circumstances prior to investing. Past performance is no indication or guarantee of future results.
The Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS®) was developed by S&P Dow Jones Indices, an independent international financial data and investment services company and a leading provider of global equity indices, and MSCI, a premier independent provider of global indices and benchmark-related products and services and has been licensed for use by Schwab.
Orders placed online through Schwab Investing Themes will have $0 commission. However, the standard online $0 commission does not apply to restricted stock transactions. Industry fees, American Depositary Receipt (ADR) fees, and foreign transaction fees still apply. See the Charles Schwab Pricing Guide for Individual Investors for full fee and commission schedules.
This material is intended for general informational and educational purposes only. This should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The securities, investment products and investment strategies mentioned are not suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for their own particular situation before making any investment or trading decisions.
All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market conditions. Data contained herein from third party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed.
For illustrative purposes only. Individual situations will vary. Not intended to be reflective of results you can expect to achieve.
Investing involves risk, including, for some products, more than your initial investment.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Thematic investing involves risk including loss of principal. The strategies are generally non-diversified and concentrated in the securities of issuers in a particular market, industry, group of industries, sector, country or asset class. As a result, a single adverse economic or regulatory occurrence may have a more significant effect on the strategies investments, be more vulnerable to adverse economic, market, political or regulatory occurrences, and may experience increased volatility than other strategies with greater diversification.
Diversification strategies do not ensure a profit and do not protect against losses in declining markets.

