Why Do Corporate Bonds Look Attractive Now?

Higher yields are not just a Treasury story. Yields have risen across much of the bond market, including yields on investment-grade and high-yield corporate bonds, as well as preferred securities. We maintain our more favorable view on each of those asset classes, and we believe the recent yield increase creates an even more attractive starting point for corporate bond investors today.

There are risks, of course. Credit spreads (the yield above a comparable Treasury) are low—meaning investors aren't compensated very well for taking additional credit risk. Any further increases in Treasury yields could pull their yields even higher, with prices potentially falling even more. Still, today's high starting yields and generally strong corporate fundamentals may provide reasons to remain invested and to take a little credit risk in moderation.

The magnitude of the losses has generally been manageable because starting yields were relatively high. Investors are generally earning substantially more income today than they did a few years ago, and those higher income payments can help offset price declines. A bond's total return reflects both its price change and the income it pays. When starting yields are low, even a modest rise in bond yields can result in a negative total return because there's little income to offset the price decline. We saw that in 2022 when the Bloomberg US Aggregate Index posted its largest loss on record. When starting yields are higher, the income payments may provide a larger buffer against price declines.

Investment-grade corporate bonds offer an attractive example. The average yield to worst of the Bloomberg U.S. Intermediate Corporate Bond Index is near 5.75%, close to the high end of its range over the past 15 years. Yield to worst is the lowest possible yield an investor can receive from a callable bond, barring default. Here we highlight the "intermediate-term" corporate bond index, as that's in-line with our view favoring short- and intermediate-term maturities today.

Those yields may appeal to investors seeking income without taking outsized credit risk. Investment-grade issuers generally have diversified businesses, stable cash flows, and less debt than high-yield issuers.

The chart below highlights how higher starting yields have historically helped boost returns over time. Using the Bloomberg U.S. Intermediate Corporate Bond Index, we examined periods of time when the index starting yield was 5.5% or more, so slightly lower than where its yield is currently. We compared the range of total returns, as well as the average total returns, when the starting yield of the index was 5.5% or higher compared to all periods. We looked at six-month, one-year, and two-year forward returns going back to 1996, and we excluded the global financial crisis. Historically, when yields were high, average returns were higher, the range of returns was narrower, and the "worst" returns were not as bad as when yields were lower. Past performance does not guarantee future results, of course, but higher yields should generally mean better returns over time.

Continuing on with corporate bonds, we also have a favorable view on high-yield corporate bonds, but it's important to understand the risks. They have sub-investment grade ratings for a reason—usually due to large amounts of debt, volatile cash flows, and thin profit markets. Those factors can keep default risk elevated in any interest rate environment, and rising Treasury yields—and higher borrowing costs in general—may suggest the risks may be even more elevated today.

Default risk may be elevated for the lowest-rated bonds in the high-yield market, but the credit quality of the Bloomberg US Corporate High-Yield Bond Index has been improving lately. Ba¹ rated issues make up 55% of the index, with Caa and below issues representing just 11% of the index. That means that the index is tilted more heavily toward "higher-rated" high-yield bonds today.

The average duration—a measure of interest rate sensitivity—of the index is also low, coming in at just 3.2 years in early October. Considering a high-yield bond strategy that tracks the index is also in line with our more favorable outlook on short- and intermediate-term maturities referenced above. Keep in mind that the index's roughly 8% average yield is driven more by the level of Treasury yields given that spreads are near 3%.

Preferred securities may also offer compelling income, with average yields near 7% or higher. Preferred securities have characteristics of both stocks and bonds, and they can be sensitive to fluctuations in either market. They also tend to have long maturities and long durations, making their prices sensitive to changes in longer-term interest rates. They tend to be subordinated to traditional corporate bonds, and unlike bond interest payments, the coupon payments from many (but not all) preferred securities are discretionary. For many preferred securities, a missed coupon payment doesn't necessarily trigger a default. Given those risks, they tend to offer relatively high yields.

We generally favor short and intermediate maturities today since we see the risks of higher long-term yields, but that doesn't mean investors need to ignore long-term investments altogether. Rather, investors should be selective about the sort of investments they consider for that sleeve, and preferreds might be a good candidate. Given their hybrid characteristics, preferreds tend to be more correlated with stocks than long-term Treasuries over time. That hasn't been the case lately, however, as preferred prices and yields have generally moved in the same direction as long-term Treasury prices and yields.

Their relatively high yields can provide meaningful income and may make them a useful complement to shorter-duration core bond holdings. Investors should generally approach preferred securities with a long time horizon and an ability to tolerate periodic price declines, while focusing on the high income payments that can potentially be earned.

Corporate balance sheets also appear healthy in the aggregate. Federal Reserve data on non-financial corporations show that companies hold a high level of liquid assets relative to their short-term liabilities. As of the second quarter, businesses had roughly 95 cents of liquid assets for every dollar of short-term obligations. That ratio has declined from earlier peaks, but it still suggests that companies generally have meaningful resources available if profit growth slows or refinancing becomes more expensive.

There are risks, of course. Capital-intensive companies, highly leveraged issuers, and businesses with near-term refinancing needs are more exposed to elevated rates. Heavy borrowing to fund artificial intelligence infrastructure and other large capital projects also increases the importance of future profitability, and concerns about future demand given the large amount of supply could pull yields and spreads even higher. For the largest technology companies, however, strong credit ratings and substantial free cash flow should help mitigate these risks for now. For weaker, lower-rated issuers, the return on that investment and the ability to service additional debt will tend to matter more.