Fed and Treasury Update: Higher-for-Longer Yields

Treasury yields remain elevated after the Federal Reserve's hawkish pivot, and we think they may stay that way.

For now, we still expect the Fed to remain in "wait-and-see" mode, looking for a clearer reason to hike rather than moving quickly. But our conviction in a prolonged pause has faded as the odds of a rate hike later this year have increased. Inflation remains a concern, the economy is resilient, partly driven by artificial intelligence-related capital expenditures, and the labor market generally remains stable, albeit with some recent softness.

The risks of a rate hike have increased lately, but we don't believe we're there just yet. If the data changes—specifically if inflation comes in hotter-than-expected over the next few months—we'll likely change our view.

Against that backdrop, we believe there's more upside risk than downside risk with the 10-year Treasury yield. As such, we've raised our expected range for the 10-year Treasury yield to 4.25% to 4.75%, from the 4.0% to 4.5% range. The change reflects a higher-for-longer fed funds rate, lingering inflation uncertainty, and fiscal concerns. The resilient economy and a generally stable labor market should limit how much yields can fall in the near term.

We think investors may want to consider keeping average duration below benchmark, depending on their goals and overall portfolio needs—but that doesn't mean hiding out in cash. While we feel short-term yields are attractive, being too short comes with an opportunity cost.

The Fed's hawkish pivot is well illustrated in the chart below, which tracks the data from the Bloomberg Economics Federal Reserve Sentiment Natural Language Processing Model. The model, also known as the Fedspeak index, measures the hawkish or dovish sentiment of Fed committee members based on public communications. A higher number means a more hawkish sentiment (meaning a bias towards more restriction), and a lower number means a more dovish sentiment (meaning a more accommodative bias).

After spending the second half of 2024 and most of 2025 below zero, or in dovish territory, the trend has reversed. But the level of perceived hawkishness is still well below the 2022 peak and close to 2016 through 2018 levels, which might suggest that only a minor adjustment to the fed funds rate may be necessary, rather than an aggressive rate hike cycle.

Inflation is the key variable for any expected move by the Fed. June's softer inflation data gave the Fed time to hold rates steady rather than hike. Most headlines indicated that core Consumer Price Index (CPI) was flat or unchanged in June, but that was on a rounded basis. The June decline was small—a drop of just 0.02%, but a decline nonetheless. That followed a string of readings at or above 0.2%, a threshold that, if resumed, could warrant a hike.

Although Fed Chair Kevin Warsh has generally avoided laying out what specific data he's watching and what conditions would justify a hike, others have been clearer. New York Fed President John Williams, vice chair of the Federal Open Market Committee, has said he wants to see monthly core inflation readings of 0.2% or less to feel confident that inflation is on a sustainable path toward the Fed's 2% goal. That bar may be difficult to clear given that several monthly readings over the past year have exceeded that threshold. A series of higher-than-expected inflation readings could increase the likelihood of a rate hike.

While June's soft inflation prints were a step in the right direction, the recent trends in other inflation measures have made it harder to defend the case for staying on hold. Higher energy prices tied to renewed Middle East tensions may lift July's headline inflation readings.

Fed officials typically look through supply shocks and one-off moves, focusing instead on core inflation, like the series shown above, which excludes volatile food and energy prices. But lately, even core inflation indicators have been moving in the wrong direction. The Dallas Fed Trimmed Mean PCE, a measure that Warsh has discussed lately, is showing more progress in getting closer to the Fed's 2% target, but it still remains above 2% despite its dip in June.

Inflation may be in the driver's seat, but the labor market still matters. When inflation is high and the labor market is weakening, the policy choice becomes more complicated. But when inflation is high and the labor market is stable, the Fed may worry less about the downside risks of a rate hike. July's jobs report came in a bit on the softer side, with nonfarm payrolls declining by 23,000 and the previous two months revised down by a combined 103,000. Along with the soft June inflation print, this allows the Fed to remain patient for now and see how the data evolves over the next few months.

The difference between the 10-year Treasury yield and the fed funds rate is another driver of our view for higher long-term yields. That gap has increased lately, with the 10-year Treasury yield at a 0.9% advantage over the fed funds rate on August 6, closing in on the 30-year average of 1.1%. That means that there's room for some upside if the Fed holds rates steady, while any potential rate hike (or hikes) makes the case even stronger for long-term yields to stay elevated.

Although yields are elevated, and with more risks to the upside than the downside, we don't believe now is the time to be aggressively adding longer-maturity investments to a bond portfolio, but investors may consider them in moderation, depending on risk tolerance and investing horizon. Keep in mind that higher yields also mean a risk of price declines. Importantly, we don't expect investors to necessarily miss out on the yields that bonds currently offer. The 10-year Treasury yield has generally held between 4% and 5% since the middle of 2023, with a few exceptions. In our view, yields may remain elevated while the Fed maintains a hawkish bias and the economy remains resilient.

With more upside risks than downside risk to long-term yields, we favor a below-benchmark duration stance. Duration is a measure of interest rate sensitivity and it's often related to a bond's maturity. The Bloomberg US Aggregate Index is often considered the benchmark index for investment-grade bond investments in the U.S., and it has an average duration of 5.9 years. As such, a "below benchmark" duration stance would mean an average duration of less than 5.9 years.

Still, yields are high enough that investors do not need to abandon intermediate- or long-term bonds entirely and focus only on ultra-short or cash-like investments. There's an opportunity cost to that approach: The 2-year Treasury yield is currently above yields on many shorter-term Treasury bills, suggesting investors may be able to earn more income by extending modestly beyond cash-like investments. Market expectations currently suggest the fed funds rate could rise to the 4% area by the middle of next year, while the 2-year Treasury yield offers a yield near 4.2%. We suggest investors consider higher-yielding short-term investments now rather than waiting for a Fed rate hike that may or may not come.

The better approach, in our view, is to stay selective: keep duration somewhat short, but avoid moving so far into cash that portfolios miss out on potential income and reinvestment opportunities.