Download the Schwab app from iTunes®Get the AppClose

  • Find a branch
To expand the menu panel use the down arrow key. Use Tab to navigate through submenu items.

The Rise of Real Estate Stocks

Sometimes you don’t know what you’ve got until it’s gone. That may be the case today for investors in financial sector index funds. In August 2016, GICS®—the Global Industry Classification Standard for equities developed by Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) and Standard & Poor’s—split off real estate securities from financials, creating a new sector for the first time since GICS was conceived in 1999. By mid-September, the mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that track these financial sector indexes had to either drop real estate securities altogether or transfer those holdings to index funds tracking the new sector. (See “What happened to my financial sector fund?” below.)

While some fund companies communicated the changes before they occurred, many investors are just now waking up to the reality that they might owe taxes on capital gains related to the shift in their funds’ holdings. Still others might be wondering whether they are underweight or overweight in financials or real estate stocks and need to rebalance.

At times like these, it’s important to understand not only what you own in your portfolio but whether it still fits your needs. Real estate stocks have very different risk-return profiles from financials, and the two sectors will likely diverge further in the months ahead as interest rates rise. So how does the new sector work—and what are the potential consequences for investors?

A look at the new sector

Nearly all of the new real estate sector is made up of equity real estate investment trusts, or REITs: companies that own physical property—apartments, malls, storage facilities and the like—and typically receive rental income. (Real estate management and brokerage companies make up the small remainder of the sector. So-called mortgage REITs, which purchase mortgages rather than physical property, remain in the financial sector.)

REITs are required to pay out a majority of their taxable income to shareholders in the form of dividends. As of late 2016, the average dividend yield of the S&P U.S. REIT Index was 4.17%, compared with 2.12% for the S&P 500® Index.1 Indeed, The Wall Street Journal reported last year that, without the benefit of REITs, the dividend yield of the financial sector could drop by about 20 basis points, from 2.28% to 2.08%.2

High dividend yields have helped REITs produce attractive returns in recent years, which prompted MCSI and Standard & Poor’s to consider adding the new sector. As of December 2016, the MSCI U.S. REIT Index, for instance, had returned 4.3% on an annualized basis over the past 10 years.3


REITs’ future prospects

The question now is whether that performance is sustainable. Equity REITs have provided attractive income streams of late, but it’s important to remember that, like all stocks, they are subject to volatility—as well as additional risks. Here are three major factors to keep an eye on:

1.     Rising interest rates. If U.S. interest rates continue to inch higher over the next several years, real estate companies’ borrowing costs will rise with them, potentially reducing profit margins. Additionally, investors have turned to REITs to generate income in the current low-rate environment, but higher interest rates may prompt many to migrate back to traditional fixed income investments.

2.     A changing rental market.

  • Home. REITs may experience additional challenges if a significant number of renters transition to homeownership. The median rent in the U.S. has been steadily increasing for nearly a decade. If the price difference between rents and mortgage payments continues to shrink, more renters may become owners, potentially leaving behind an oversupply of rental apartments.
  • Commercial. Declining sales at brick-and-mortar shops due to the rise of online shopping will likely lower the rents malls charge tenants, further undercutting equity REITs. 
  • Office. The demand for office space may decline if the trend toward working remotely continues.

3.     The current U.S. economic expansion. Although an economic contraction isn’t yet on the horizon, all expansions eventually lead to a recession. Given the cyclical nature of commercial real estate, that could mean oversupplies of offices, malls, factories and other commercial properties many REITs rely on for income.
To be sure, we don’t believe rental markets are in danger of imminent collapse. For income-minded investors, maintaining the same amount of exposure that the S&P 500 allocates to equity REITs—about 3%—may make sense given their historically attractive dividend payouts. But we do expect the longer-term trends identified above to start solidifying over the next two years. Consequently, if the percentage of real estate holdings in your portfolio exceeds that 3% mark, it might be time to consider taking some profits.

What happened to my financial sector fund?

To adjust to the new real estate sector classification, mutual funds and exchange-traded funds that track the Global Industry Classification Standard for equities developed by Morgan Stanley Capital International and Standard & Poor’s had to either drop real estate securities altogether or transfer those holdings to index funds tracking the new sector. Both moves have ramifications for investors’ sector allocations and taxes:

  1. Real estate drop: Most funds elected to sell off their real estate investments and reinvest the proceeds back into the core financial stocks left in the existing sector fund. This meant investors in such funds had more exposure than before to banks, brokerages, insurers and other core financial holdings. Given REITs’ price gains in recent years, it also means that those investors will likely owe capital gains taxes come April 15. Check your related annual 1099 tax form for more information.
  2. Real estate swap: The remaining funds transferred their real estate holdings to stand-alone real estate index funds, which were awarded to fund holders through a special dividend of shares. The tax treatment of the special dividend will vary from fund to fund, so it’s best to check with your fund provider or tax professional for specific details.

    1. S&P Dow Jones Indices, as of 11/30/2016.

    2. Daisy Maxey, “When REITs Leave, Financial-Sector Funds Could Lose Some Yield,” The Wall Street Journal, 08/18/2016.

    3. MSCI Inc., as of 12/16/2016.

    What you can do next:

     

    • Check your 2016 1099-B form. If you own a financial sector fund that sold its real estate holdings and reinvested the proceeds in financials, you’ll probably owe taxes on capital gains.
    • If you own a financial sector fund that distributed a special dividend of REIT shares, check with your fund provider or tax professional for more details.
    • Log in to your Schwab account to check your holdings.

     

    Selecting Executors and Trustees for Your Estate
    Can You Answer These 5 Common ETF Questions?

    Important Disclosures

    Investing in REITs may pose additional risks such as real estate industry risk, interest rate risk and liquidity risk.

    Risks of REITs are similar to those associated with direct ownership of real estate, such as changes in real estate values and property taxes, interest rates, cash flow of underlying real estate assets, supply and demand, and the management skill and creditworthiness of the issuer.
    Schwab does not provide tax advice. Clients should consult a professional tax advisor for their tax advice needs.

    The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The investment strategies mentioned here may not be suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decision.

    All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market conditions. Data contained herein from third-party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed.

    (0217-MT68)

    Thumbs up / down votes are submitted voluntarily by readers and are not meant to suggest the future performance or suitability of any account type, product or service for any particular reader and may not be representative of the experience of other readers. When displayed, thumbs up / down vote counts represent whether people found the content helpful or not helpful and are not intended as a testimonial. Any written feedback or comments collected on this page will not be published. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. may in its sole discretion re-set the vote count to zero, remove votes appearing to be generated by robots or scripts, or remove the modules used to collect feedback and votes.