Download the Schwab app from iTunes®Close

One Step Closer … to Peak Earnings Growth?

In what shaped up to be a very impressive first half of the year for both the economy and stock market, stellar earnings growth has been a key ingredient. Coming off stronger-than-expected S&P 500 earnings growth of 53% (year/year) in the first quarter, second-quarter earnings are currently anticipated to grow by 78%, the highest since 2009. Though less than half of companies have reported, the expected growth rate is already higher than the initial consensus estimate of 65%.

As was also the case in the first quarter, the beat rate—the percentage of companies reporting earnings growth higher than analysts’ estimates—remains quite high at 89%. In a typical quarter (since 1994), 66% of companies beat estimates; and over the past four quarters, the beat rate has been 83%.

In the table below, you can see a sector breakdown for growth this quarter (and into the next full year). Cyclical areas of the market sit atop the earnings leaderboard, including Industrials, Consumer Discretionary, and Energy. Much of that is due to their tighter connection to economic growth; but also “base effects” given their marked struggles in last year’s second quarter, when the economy was shut down.  

Earnings strength led by cyclicals

Source: Charles Schwab, I/B/E/S data from Refinitiv, as of 7/26/2021.  Forecasts contained herein are for illustrative purposes only, may be based upon proprietary research and are developed through analysis of historical public data.

 

As shown above, the second quarter is expected to represent the peak in the earnings growth rate (although not the level of earnings). As of now, the growth rate is expected to slow to 27% in the third quarter, a noticeable decrease but still strong. Future estimates show a consistent stairstep pattern down, as shown in the chart below.

As earnings cool, so does market historically

Source: Charles Schwab, I/B/E/S data from Refinitiv, as of 7/26/2021.  4Q08's reading of -67% is truncated at -40% and 4Q09's reading of 206% is truncated at 80%. Forecasts contained herein are for illustrative purposes only, may be based upon proprietary research and are developed through analysis of historical public data.

 

Unsurprisingly, the market has tended to move in concert with earnings growth (or lack thereof in instances of economic and/or earnings recessions). As history shows, the deceleration in profit expansion is suggestive of more modest returns for the stock market. Yet, that doesn’t mean we’re facing an imminent downturn, given we are moving off a peak north of 50% for the S&P 500’s year/year return.

In the near term, the good news is that investors have been rewarding companies that beat analysts’ expectations, as the average company has produced an earnings report day return of 0.3% above the S&P 500’s thus far. That may seem like a given during earnings seasons, but as shown in the chart below, it hasn’t been the case in the past couple quarters. For companies that beat estimates in the first quarter of 2021, their average earnings report day return in excess of the S&P 500’s was a paltry 0.1%; while in the fourth quarter of 2020, it was -0.4%. Less surprising is the fact that companies missing estimates have underperformed the overall market on earnings report day by an average of -2.1%.

Beats again being rewarded

Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg, as of 7/23/2021. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

 

Dissecting valuation

The strength in earnings has continued to alleviate some valuation pressures. Coming off the March 2020 lows and through the end of last year, the S&P 500’s forward price/earnings (P/E) ratio soared to its highest since the dot-com bubble in the late-1990s, as earnings (the denominator) fell sharply and stock prices (the numerator) rebounded swiftly. This year, earnings have been on fire, which has helped bring down the forward P/E, as shown in the chart below. The dotted lines show both the expected trajectory for earnings and in turn what the trajectory for the forward P/E would be, all else equal. (The P is not stationary, so the blue dotted line is purely illustrative of the power of a rapidly improving E.) 

The ‘E’ still doing the heavy lifting

Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg, as of 7/23/2021. Forecasts contained herein are for illustrative purposes only, may be based upon proprietary research and are developed through analysis of historical public data.

 

Notwithstanding the decline in the forward P/E since late-last year, stocks are not cheap in absolute terms. Most valuation metrics that include price as the numerator are still quite stretched relative to their long-term history, as shown in the chart below. On the other hand, yield- or interest rate-based metrics—such as equity risk premiums—show that the market looks more attractive at current levels; given interest rates remain historically low.

As we often remind investors, although valuation metrics are considered fundamental in nature—given their quantifiable components—the reality is that valuation is also a sentiment indicator or, perhaps more precisely, an indicator of sentiment. Just as record-high valuations in the late-1990s were tied to abundant euphoria; the extremely low valuations in early-2009 reflected abundant despair.

Rate-based valuations remain in green zone

Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg, The Leuthold Group, as of 7/23/2021. Due to data limitations, start dates for each metric vary and are as follows: CAPE: 1900; Dividend yield: 1928; Normalized P/E: 1946; Market cap/GDP, Tobin’s Q: 1952; Trailing P/E: 1960; Fed Model: 1965;  Equity risk premium, forward P/E, price/book, price/cash flow, rule of 20: 1990. Percentile ranking is shown from lowest in green to highest in red. A higher percentage indicates a higher rank/valuation relative to history. For illustrative purposes only.

 

The one exception to the bullish yield-based argument is the S&P 500’s real earnings yield (REY), which is the inverse of the P/E ratio, adjusted for inflation (consumer price index). Thanks to the recent spike in inflation, the REY has fallen sharply into negative territory. As shown in the chart below, at -2%, it’s at its lowest since 1974. The rub is that, for what was the entirety of the bull rally that preceded the pandemic, this metric was used as a justification for equities that otherwise looked extremely stretched relative to earnings. Clearly that isn’t the case anymore; and for what it’s worth, when the real earnings yield was negative in the past, the average forward one-year return for the S&P 500 was -4.7%.

A real problem for the real earnings yield

Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg, as of 6/30/2021. Real earnings yield is defined as S&P 500 current earnings yield minus y/y % change in CPI.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

 

In sum

While earnings have already surprised to the upside in the second quarter, the magnitude of strength has been expected. Looking ahead, earnings growth rates will likely continue to cool, as comparisons to the prior year inevitably become more difficult. As we have continued to point out, investors should focus not just on the earnings growth rate; but also what companies are saying with respect to inflationary pressures, profit margins, and forward guidance.

If supply constraints and some temporary spikes among commodity prices were severe enough to weigh on companies’ pricing power, there is a risk that profit margins take a hit in the near future. For now, forward margin estimates haven’t weakened and companies have raised forward guidance at an impressive rate. This is a welcome improvement relative to last year, when a record number of S&P 500 companies were forced to eliminate guidance (given the unique uncertainty brought on by the pandemic). While there is a considerable portion of S&P 500 members still to report, the upgrades in outlooks thus far are signaling continued strength for profits.

Market behavior could become choppier as earnings growth slows; with continued, large swings in sector leadership (on a day-to-day and week-to-week basis). Investors’ best protection against volatility continues to be diversification across and within asset classes, and discipline around periodic rebalancing.

What You Can Do Next

Important Disclosures:

The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The investment strategies mentioned here may not be suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decision.

All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market conditions. Data contained herein from third-party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed. Supporting documentation for any claims or statistical information is available upon request.

Examples provided are for illustrative purposes only and not intended to be reflective of results you can expect to achieve.

Investing involves risk including loss of principal.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results and the opinions presented cannot be viewed as an indicator of future performance.

Forecasts contained herein are for illustrative purposes only, may be based upon proprietary research and are developed through analysis of historical public data.

Diversification and rebalancing portfolio strategies cannot ensure a profit or protect against a loss in any given market environment.  Rebalancing may cause investors to incur transaction costs and, when rebalancing a non-retirement account, taxable events may be created that may affect your tax liability.

Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs and expenses and cannot be invested in directly. For more information on indexes please see www.schwab.com/indexdefinitions.

Rule of 20: Stocks are considered fairly valued when the sum of the S&P 500 forward P/E ratio and the year-over-year change in the consumer price index (CPI) is equal to 20 (or inexpensive when it’s below 20).

Shiller’s Cyclically-Adjusted P/E (CAPE):  This model uses an inflation-adjusted price for the S&P 500 and divides by reported earnings over the prior 10 years.

Tobin’s Q:  Developed by Nobel Laureate James Tobin, it’s a fairly simple concept, but laborious to calculate (calculations are done by the U.S. government and the ratio’s readings are provided by the Fed). It’s often called the Q Ratio and is the total price of the U.S. stock market divided by the replacement cost of all its companies. A high Q (greater than .85) implies overvaluation.

(0721-19PN)

Thumbs up / down votes are submitted voluntarily by readers and are not meant to suggest the future performance or suitability of any account type, product or service for any particular reader and may not be representative of the experience of other readers. When displayed, thumbs up / down vote counts represent whether people found the content helpful or not helpful and are not intended as a testimonial. Any written feedback or comments collected on this page will not be published. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. may in its sole discretion re-set the vote count to zero, remove votes appearing to be generated by robots or scripts, or remove the modules used to collect feedback and votes.