Download the Schwab app from iTunes®Get the AppClose

  • Find a branch
To expand the menu panel use the down arrow key. Use Tab to navigate through submenu items.

Schwab Market Perspective

Schwab Market Perspective: Balancing Act

Key Points
  • Markets seem to have found a good balance between economic/earnings growth and trade concerns, allowing stocks to move back toward the top end of their 2018 range. But that balance can end quickly and investors should remain diversified and disciplined. 

  • Earnings season has largely bested elevated expectations but we’ve seen disappointments punished severely. Trade concerns remain top of mind but a few glimmers of hope dot the headlines as well. Meanwhile, the Fed held rates steady and is searching for balance between growth and inflation.

  • Central banks remain in focus globally, with yield curves being closely watched. The Fed has expressed little concern but financial conditions have gotten tighter this year, which has implications for markets.

“Happiness is not a matter of intensity but of balance, order, rhythm and harmony.”
     -   Thomas Merton

Goldilocks peaks her head out

After searching for direction, it appears stocks have found some balance, at least for now. Major U.S. indexes have moved out toward the high end their recent ranges; with the NASDAQ recently hitting a new high and the S&P 500 threatening to do so, before again pulling back on continued trade tensions. 

Stocks have moved toward top of recent range—but still vulnerable to pullbacks

S&P 500 with 50-day MAV

Gains appear to have been fueled by a mix of continuing good economic news, with second quarter real gross domestic product (GDP) growth coming in at an annualized rate of 4.1% according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. More than $20 billion was pulled from stock-focused mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in June, according to Morningstar—capping the third worst first half for equity flows in the past decade. The trend doesn’t appear to be changing as investors redeemed another $11.6 billion from domestic stock funds in the three weeks ended July 18. That healthy conflict between optimism and skepticism can be a good mix for stocks, as we’ve seen recently; but can also change relatively quickly so staying disciplined and not chasing returns remains important. 

One reason for caution is that we’re entering what has traditionally been a tough time for equities. As we’ve noted before, midterm election years have been rough for stocks, with the average decline or “drawdown” being 17% in the S&P 500 since 1950, with much of the weakness clustered in the summer months. However, going from each of those midterm drawdowns’ troughs, the subsequent one-year performance was a strong 32%. History certainly doesn’t guarantee the future, but it does give us some reason for a bit of caution over the next couple of months. 

Midterm years have had historical problems

Max drawdown vs 1-yr performance

Source: Charles Schwab, Macrobond, Standard and Poor’s.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Trade continues to dominate

Also raising our level of caution is the ongoing trade disputes going on between the United States and China, among other countries. Investors are digesting concerns increasingly being mentioned on corporate conference calls during second quarter earnings season so far; but have yet to see significant impact on the economy. Confidence surveys remain elevated, with regional surveys such as the Richmond Fed Survey remaining well in territory depicting expansion; while the national Institute of Supply Management’s (ISM) Manufacturing Index remained elevated at 58.1, although down slightly from the previous month. The weakness in the new orders component was more pronounced. In fact, ISM has been noting that many respondents to their monthly survey mentioned trade concerns. ISM chairman Timothy Fiore has this to say on August 1: “We’re seeing a lot of comments from the respondents about evaluating whether to manufacture something in the U.S. or make it in Canada or make it in Mexico. If the end market is Europe or China, then you’re going to want to move it outside the U.S. at this point.” For now, the consumer seems relatively unconcerned about the possibility of higher costs due to increased tariffs as consumer confidence also remains elevated. However, there is a wide gap between consumers’ current confidence (higher) and their future expectations (lower).

Trade doesn’t appear to be denting confidence to a great degree…yet 

ISM manuf. vs ISM Man new orders
consumer confidence vs expectations

We were modestly encouraged by the results of the meeting between President Trump and European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker, which resulted in a standing down of the escalating tensions between the two regions. Of course, no firm agreements were agreed to, other than to hold off on further tariffs for the time being, so things could still escalate. And of course there have been no signs of thawing between China and the United States, with the Trump administration now threatening to up the tariff rate on $200 billion worth of Chinese goods from the proposed 10% to 25%. For now, only the European developments, as well as some apparent progress with NAFTA deals, give us some hope that we may not descend into a full global trade war. 

Despite trade-related concerns, companies largely bested even elevated consensus earnings expectations, with Thomson Reuters reporting that 80% of the 380 companies in the S&P 500 having reported so far have beaten earnings estimates, well above the average beat rate of 68.3%. Even with these better results, estimates for the remainder of 2018 and calendar year 2019 continue to move higher.  

Corporate confidence and strength can also be seen in the labor market as jobless claims—the most leading of jobs indicators—recently hit the lowest level in more than 48 years.

Forward looking labor indicator remains historically positive 

Weekly initial jobless claims - 4-week MAV

That’s backed up by the more lagging data out of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which showed although a fewer-than-expected 157,000 jobs were added in July, the previous two months were revised higher by 59,000 jobs and the unemployment rate moving down to 3.9%. The tight labor market still isn’t resulting in a surge in wage gains as the average hourly earnings number rose a modest 2.7% year-over-year.

Fed continues to seek balance

Wage gains and the tight labor market are playing into the Federal Reserve’s plans for upcoming Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meetings. Their most recent meeting resulted in no action on rates, as expected; but the market is nearly fully pricing in a hike in September. The messaging from the FOMC lately—including from Fed Chair Jerome Powell—is that the Fed is no longer on “auto pilot.”  Future moves will apparently be more reactive to economic developments, which could result in more volatility and uncertainty; especially given that every FOMC meeting starting in January will have a press conference tied to it (thereby making every meeting a “live” one).

Global balance also in focus?

There are headwinds to global growth including the trade worries and Fed rate hikes; but there are also some tailwinds like economic stimulus in the United States (tax cuts) and China. It seems like the global stock market went from focusing on the headwinds to the tailwinds in July with a 2.9% gain for the MSCI AC World Index. In fact, despite the ebb and flow of trade tensions and rising expectations for two more rate hikes by the Fed this year, July saw stock market gains every week after five months of weak performance; indicating at least a temporary balance between good and bad news.

July brought back the green for the world’s stocks

MSCI AC World monthly returns

Monthly performance of MSCI AC World Index.  Past performance is no indication of future results.
Source: Charles Schwab, Factset data as of 7/31/2018.

In July, the global manufacturing purchasing managers index (PMI)—the most timely monthly indicator of global economic growth—ticked down again and extended the slide this year to 52.7 from 54.5. In our view, this had led to investors seeing the global economy as a “glass half empty.” But the latest reading remains well above 50—the level that marks the line between growth and contraction—in our perception helping investors in July shift to a “glass half full” perspective about the global economy. 

Glass half empty or half full?

Global Manufacturing PMI

Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg data as of 7/31/2018.

There are also signs of stabilizing economic momentum outside of manufacturing; such the rebound in recent months in the global service PMI to near the highest levels in a few years. This has lifted the overall composite PMI (which includes both manufacturing and services), as you can see in the chart below. This suggests the slide in the global manufacturing PMI may not extend all the way down to near 50 as it did in 2013 and 2016 when non-manufacturing indicators were also deteriorating. 

Service sector rebound

Global Services and Composite PMIs

Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg data as of 7/31/2018.

It is also important to note that after worsening earlier in the year, global financial conditions are now improving even in Asia, as you can see in the chart below. The stabilization in July of Asia’s financial conditions was led by central bank easing reflected in significantly lower interest rates in China, where the 3-month SHIBOR rate fell by more than one percentage point from mid-June to the end of July.

Global financial conditions improving

Bllomberg Financial Conditions Indexes

Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg data as of 7/31/2018.

The improvement outside of global manufacturing is encouraging. However, global stock markets could focus again on risks in August (last week we provided our Top Five Global Risks for Investors in 2018: Mid-Year Update). August has been a month known for volatility and has often been a month of losses for global stocks. 

So what?

Tension between good news and investor concerns is often a good place for stocks to be, but that environment can change quickly; and with us entering a historically difficult seasonal time of the calendar for stocks, we urge discipline, including around diversification and rebalancing. Corporate earnings and the U.S. economy remain strong, but trade concerns, midterm elections and monetary policy concerns pose risks. We believe the secular bull market in the United States remains intact, but pullbacks are likely.

What Does GDP Mean For The Stock Market?
What Does GDP Mean For The Stock Market?
Real Estate Sector Rating: Underperform
Real estate sector

Important Disclosures

International investments are subject to additional risks such as currency fluctuations, political instability and the potential for illiquid markets. Investing in emerging markets can accentuate these risks.

The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The investment strategies mentioned here may not be suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decision. 

All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market, economic or political conditions. Data contained herein from third party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed. This content was created as of the specific date indicated and reflects the author’s views as of that date. 

Diversification and rebalancing of a portfolio cannot assure a profit or protect against a loss in any given market environment. Rebalancing may cause investors to incur transaction costs and, when rebalancing a non-retirement account, taxable events may be created that may affect your tax liability.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Forecasts contained herein are for illustrative purposes only, may be based upon proprietary research and are developed through analysis of historical public data.

The S&P 500 Composite Index is a market capitalization-weighted index of 500 of the most widely-held U.S. companies in the industrial, transportation, utility, and financial sectors.

Richmond Manufacturing Index A gauge of broad activity in the manufacturing sector located in the Fifth Federal Reserve District, published by the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. The index is a composite index that represents a weighted average of the shipments, new orders and employment indexes. Each index is a diffusion index, i.e. it is equal to the percentage of responding firms reporting increases minus the percentage reporting decreases, with results based on responses from 80 out of 110 firms surveyed. 

The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Manufacturing Index is an index based on surveys of more than 300 manufacturing firms by the Institute of Supply Management. The ISM Manufacturing Index monitors employment, production inventories, new orders and supplier deliveries.

The Consumer Confidence Index is a survey by the Conference Board that measures how optimistic or pessimistic consumers are with respect to the economy in the near future

Consumer confidence index, Expectations is based on households' plans for major purchases and their economic situation, both currently and their expectations for the immediate future. 

MSCI AC World Index  is market capitalization weighted index designed to provide a broad measure of equity-market performance throughout the world. The MSCI ACWI is maintained by Morgan Stanley Capital International, and is comprised of stocks from both developed and emerging markets.   The MSCI ACWI captures large and mid cap representation across 23 Developed Markets (DM) and 24 Emerging Markets (EM) countries.

The Global Manufacturing Purchasing Managers Index is an indicator of the economic health of the manufacturing sector. It is based on based on the results of surveys covering over 10,000 purchasing executives in 32 countries. Together these countries account for an estimated 89% of global manufacturing output. The PMI index is based on five major indicators: new orders, inventory levels, production, supplier deliveries and the employment environment.

The J.P. Morgan Global Services PMI provides advance insight into the global services sector, which gives investors a better understanding of business conditions and valuable information about the economic backdrop of global markets.

The J.P. Morgan Global Composite PMI data give a detailed look at the manufacturing and services sectors, how busy it is and where things are headed.

Bloomberg  Euro-Zone Financial Conditions Index Index} tracks the overall stress in the Euro-Zone money market, bond market, and equity market and provides a useful gauge to assess the availability and cost of credit in the Eurozone financial market.

The Bloomberg U.S. Financial Conditions Index provides a daily statistical measure of the relative strength of the U.S. money markets, bond markets, and equity markets, and is considered an accurate gauge of the overall conditions in U.S. financial and credit markets

Bloomberg Asia (x-Japan) Financial Conditions Index Index} tracks the overall stress in the Asia (excluding Japan) money market, bond market, and equity market and provides a useful gauge to assess the availability and cost of credit in the Asian (excluding Japan)  financial market.

Bloomberg United Kingdom Financial Conditions Index Index} tracks the overall stress in the United Kingdom money market, bond market, and equity market and provides a useful gauge to assess the availability and cost of credit in the United Kingdom financial market.

The Schwab Center for Financial Research is a division of Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

(0818-81A4)

Thumbs up / down votes are submitted voluntarily by readers and are not meant to suggest the future performance or suitability of any account type, product or service for any particular reader and may not be representative of the experience of other readers. When displayed, thumbs up / down vote counts represent whether people found the content helpful or not helpful and are not intended as a testimonial. Any written feedback or comments collected on this page will not be published. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. may in its sole discretion re-set the vote count to zero, remove votes appearing to be generated by robots or scripts, or remove the modules used to collect feedback and votes.