Download the Schwab app from iTunes®Close

LIBOR Phase-Out: What Does It Mean for You?

LIBOR is a term investors and consumers alike have probably heard before, although you may not know exactly what it is. But now the scandal-marred rate is set to be phased out in a couple of years. Below, we’ll discuss the basics of LIBOR, why it’s going away, and what that may mean for investors and consumers.

What is LIBOR?

LIBOR stands for London Interbank Offered Rate. These rates—there are 35 of them across various maturities and currencies—are administered by the Intercontinental Exchange, or ICE, and are sometimes referred to as ICE LIBOR rates. LIBOR rates are rates that banks charge each other for short-term loans. More specifically, LIBOR “is designed to produce an average rate that is representative of the rates at which large, leading internationally active banks with access to the wholesale, unsecured funding market could fund themselves in such market in particular currencies for certain tenors,” according to the ICE.1

LIBOR rates are set every business day. Rates can be as short as an overnight rate and as long as a 12-month rate. LIBOR rates are set in five currencies: U.S. dollar, Japanese yen, Swiss franc, euro and British pound sterling. In the U.S., three-month LIBOR is one of the most frequently used rates for pegging borrowing costs.  

Why does LIBOR matter?

LIBOR rates affect us both as consumers and as investors. LIBOR is often the reference rate for many different types of loans, including:

  • Adjustable-rate mortgages
  • Home equity loans and lines of credit
  • Auto loans
  • Student loans
  • Credit cards

LIBOR also plays a key role in many types of investments, usually those with floating coupon rates. Rather than having fixed coupon payments, the coupon rates on these investments tend to equal a short-term reference rate, usually three-month LIBOR, plus a spread. The spread is compensation for the additional risks of holding these types of investments relative to more conservative investments like U.S. Treasury securities. LIBOR rates represent benchmarks for trillions of dollars in securities across the globe.2 Some common investments with floating coupon rates include:

  • Investment-grade floating-rate notes
  • Floating-rate or variable-rate preferred securities
  • Bank loans

These investments tend to benefit when short-term rates are rising. The opposite is also true—when short-term rates fall, their coupons rates tend to fall as well. 

LIBOR rates usually track other short-term interest rates, like the U.S. federal funds rate, but they can also be an indication of risk. If there are concerns about the financial system, or broad risks in the economy, LIBOR rates may rise as the banks’ cost of borrowing rises. As the chart below illustrates,  three-month LIBOR tends to track the federal funds rate, but during periods of market stress—for instance, during the 2008-09 financial crisis, and, to a lesser extent, during the European debt crisis of 2011-12—the two rates have diverged.

Three-month LIBOR usually tracks the federal funds rate, but has diverged at times

Three-month LIBOR jumped to 4.05% on September 30, 2008, while the federal funds target rate midpoint remained steady at 2%. Several years later, three-month LIBOR rose to 0.58% on December 30, 2011, while the federal funds target rate midpoint remained at 0.13%.

Source: Bloomberg. Monthly data as of 09/30/2019. ICE LIBOR USD 3 Month (US0003 Index) and U.S. Federal Funds Target Rate Mid Point of Range (FDTRMID).

What was the LIBOR scandal?

If you’ve heard of LIBOR during the past few years, it’s most likely not for good reasons. The rate has been marred by scandal. Because LIBOR rates are set by banks submitting their own estimates of their borrowing costs, the rates can be manipulated by those member banks—and they have been.

For instance, during the financial crisis, some banks submitted low numbers to make it appear they were in better shape than they actually were. Borrowing costs can be an indication of risk—riskier borrowers tend to be charged higher rates—so the lower rates helped masked the liquidity problems that many banks were experiencing at the time.

Some banks also tried to manipulate LIBOR rates to make profits. According to the Council on Foreign Relations, banks submitted “rates to provide figures that would benefit the traders, instead of submitting the rates the bank would actually pay to borrow money.”3 In other words, banks manipulated LIBOR rates to benefit their own LIBOR-linked investments.

Since investigations began in 2012, regulators in the United States, the United Kingdom and the European Union have fined banks more than $9 billion for their participation in LIBOR-rigging schemes.4

Why is LIBOR going away?

One reason could be that it has lost creditability from the scandal. But according to the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the regulatory agency that oversees LIBOR, it’s because LIBOR rates don’t reflect costs from actual transactions. In a 2017 speech, Andrew Bailey, CEO of the FCA, said the rate will be phased out because “the underlying market that LIBOR seeks to measure—the market for wholesale term lending to banks—is no longer sufficiently active.”5 In that speech, Bailey cited an extreme example in which one of the LIBOR rates (remember, there are multiple currencies and tenors) reflected just 15 transactions of a qualifying size for all of 2016. Regulators would prefer to see reference rates that are based more on actual transactions than subjective judgments. According to the FCA, LIBOR is set to be phased out by the end of 2021.

What does this mean for investors?

The Secured Overnight Financing Rate has gained momentum in the U.S. as the successor to LIBOR rates. In June 2017, the Alternative Reference Rates Committee selected SOFR as its recommended alternative to LIBOR. After months of work, the New York Federal Reserve first began publishing the rate in April 2018.

How this translates to investors and consumers is a little less straightforward. Each investment, security, or loan that cites LIBOR as its reference rate has its own contract with its own set of terms. Unless a back-up rate is listed in a prospectus or contract, the new rate and terms will need to be agreed upon between the borrowers and the lenders. Since LIBOR’s retirement was announced, many floating-rate investments have been issued with three-month LIBOR still being used as reference rate. However, many prospectuses have included more explicit fallback language for when LIBOR is officially gone.

For investors, many investments that track LIBOR rates tend to be short-term in nature. For example, average maturity of the issues in the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Floating-Rate Note Index is just 2.1 years, but roughly 59% of the underlying issues have maturities of greater than two years.6 Bank loans, a riskier type of corporate debt that tracks LIBOR, tend to have short maturities as well—usually five years or less. While many of these investments may simply mature before the phase-out occurs, there are still a number of issues that still reference LIBOR and whose outlook is more uncertain.

Investments with longer maturities, like preferred securities, likely will need to be addressed on a case-by-case basis. Most preferred securities have call features, meaning the issuer can “call,” or redeem, them at their par price after a certain date has passed. Given that many floating-rate preferred or variable-rate preferred securities use three-month LIBOR as their benchmark, issuers may choose to call in the securities at the next available call date close to the LIBOR phase-out date.

Any change to an underlying reference rate likely would require consent from holders of such investments. In most situations, consent is required by some sort of majority of the investors. This could be a long and drawn-out process.

While there are still plenty of unknowns, investors will want to see how the alternative reference rates stack up to the original LIBOR rates their investments tracked, to make sure the new yield compensation is adequate. For example, SOFR had generally trended below three-month LIBOR since its inception, but as markets began to price in Fed easing, three-month LIBOR has generally been lower than SOFR. In other words, a switch to a new reference rate can have an impact on the floating-rate investments' coupon payments, for better or for worse.

Another risk is the implementation of alternative reference rates like SOFR. For example, when a corporation  issues a floating-rate note tied to SOFR, seasoned floaters that are still tied to LIBOR may be less desirable and could potentially experience a loss of liquidity once LIBOR is officially retired. In the bond market, lower liquidity usually leads to a large gap between what a bond can be bought or sold for, and usually leads to more price volatility. This could negatively affect holders of these types of investments.

What to do now

Unfortunately there are still many unknowns when it comes to LIBOR-linked investments. Considering that the projected phase-out is still two years away, the transition to new benchmarks is likely to be orderly. But we do see some risks as we get closer to the phase-out date. For investors who own LIBOR-linked investments, higher-than-normal price volatility may arise if the transition doesn’t go as smoothly as planned. We think it’s important to pay attention to how this unfolds so you won’t be surprised if and when these changes affect your investments.

1 Source: Intercontinental Exchange website.
2 Source: SEC, “Staff Statement on LIBOR Transition,” July 12, 2019.
3 “Understanding the LIBOR Scandal,” Council on Foreign Relations, October 12, 2016.
4 Ibid.
5 “The Future of LIBOR,” Financial Conduct Authority, July 27, 2017.
6 As of October 15, 2019.

What You Can Do Next

Important Disclosures

The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The investment strategies mentioned here may not be suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decision.

All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market or economic conditions. Data contained herein from third party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results and the opinions presented cannot be viewed as an indicator of future performance.

Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs and expenses and cannot be invested in directly. For more information on indexes please see

Diversification strategies do not ensure a profit and do not protect against losses in declining markets.

Fixed income securities are subject to increased loss of principal during periods of rising interest rates. Fixed-income investments are subject to various other risks including changes in credit quality, market valuations, liquidity, prepayments, early redemption, corporate events, tax ramifications and other factors. Lower-rated securities are subject to greater credit risk, default risk, and liquidity risk.

Source: Bloomberg Index Services Limited. BLOOMBERG® is a trademark and service mark of Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates (collectively “Bloomberg”). BARCLAYS® is a trademark and service mark of Barclays Bank Plc (collectively with its affiliates, “Barclays”), used under license. Bloomberg or Bloomberg’s licensors, including Barclays, own all proprietary rights in the Bloomberg Barclays Indices. Neither Bloomberg nor Barclays approves or endorses this material, or guarantees the accuracy or completeness of any information herein, or makes any warranty, express or implied, as to the results to be obtained therefrom and, to the maximum extent allowed by law, neither shall have any liability or responsibility for injury or damages arising in connection therewith.

The Schwab Center for Financial Research is a division of Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.


Thumbs up / down votes are submitted voluntarily by readers and are not meant to suggest the future performance or suitability of any account type, product or service for any particular reader and may not be representative of the experience of other readers. When displayed, thumbs up / down vote counts represent whether people found the content helpful or not helpful and are not intended as a testimonial. Any written feedback or comments collected on this page will not be published. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. may in its sole discretion re-set the vote count to zero, remove votes appearing to be generated by robots or scripts, or remove the modules used to collect feedback and votes.