Download the Schwab app from iTunes®Get the AppClose

  • Find a branch
To expand the menu panel use the down arrow key. Use Tab to navigate through submenu items.

Interest Rates: What Happens After Liftoff?

Interest Rates: What Happens After Liftoff?
Copy and paste link for other apps.



Schwab's chief investment strategist Liz Ann Sonders, and fixed income analyst Collin Martin, discuss what a “low and slow” rise in interest rates could mean for the stock and bond markets.



Click to show the transcript
Rick Karr
Some investors are excited by the prospect of higher interest rates. Others aren’t sure what to expect because it’s been a long time since the Federal Reserve increased rates—nearly a decade. On this installment, we’ll talk about what life may be like after the rate hike. 
You're listening to the Insights & Ideas podcast brought to you by Charles Schwab. I'm Rick Karr. When rates rise, the stock and bond markets react in different ways. So I have a guest for each market: Schwab's chief investment strategist Liz Ann Sonders for stocks, and fixed income strategist Collin Martin for bonds. They agree that the first move the Fed makes is not the important one for investors. It's what the Fed does next.
Liz Ann says that can provide some insight into what kind of rate cycle is coming.
Liz Ann Sonders
If you go back to the mid 1940s and look at every rate cycle—and there are three categories of them. There's slow, there's fast, and then there's another interesting one to think about which is what is sometimes called the non-cycle or a one-and-done cycle, where the Fed moves once, maybe twice, but then that's it. It doesn't turn into the beginning of a cycle.
And that's the more rare of experiences, although we've had four of those since the mid 1940s. But if you look at the slow cycles, on average, the market in the year after the Fed has begun is up 10.8 percent. In the fast cycles, a year after the Fed initiated a fast cycle, the market, on average, is down I think 2.7 or 2.8 percent. And a non-cycle is up there at around 11 percent, along with the slow cycles.
Rick Karr
Collin, is there sort of a similar, I would presume, reverse pattern with bonds?
Collin Martin
We like to always point out that, first and foremost, the Fed only controls the Fed funds rate. There isn't one interest rate out there. There's a lot of different maturities, different types of bonds. So when the Fed funds rate does increase, it doesn't mean that all bond yields are necessarily going to rise. Now, investors that are concerned about the negative impacts, that's because bond prices and yields move in opposite directions.
But we like to point out that over time, coupon payments can help offset some of the potential drop in prices. And if you hold bonds to maturity, barring default, you should get paid back the bond's par value at maturity. But higher yields do offer opportunities for investors who've been waiting for the Fed to rise and waiting to kind of increase their savings. So it's really good for savers, because you'll be able to get a little bit more return on your lower-risk investments.
On the other side of that, it does have some negative effects for consumers or borrowers, for example, because things like car loans or mortgages can fluctuate. 
Liz Ann Sonders
To add to Collin's point, in a cycle where the Fed is more likely to go slow, which, of course, we think that will be the cycle this time, because inflation is not accelerated—it's not a big risk—which, in turn, should alleviate some of the upward pressure that would exist on longer-term interest rates if we were in an inflationary cycle, which we do not think we are.
Rick Karr
It's been feeling to me like for months and months we hear “The job market’s tightening, the job market’s tightening.”  Shouldn’t that, at some point push the inflation rate higher?
Liz Ann Sonders
Right. Obviously the transmission mechanism between the Fed's two mandates of employment and inflation is through wages. And you're absolutely right. Wage growth has been quite anemic for an extended period of time.
And many of the factors that historically have kicked in that allow for wages to start to pick up—a sufficient decline in the unemployment rate and job growth picking up, some other measures, leading indicators for wages—all suggest that we should be seeing the beginning of an upward wage cycle. We just haven't yet. 
And I think that's one of the reasons why the Fed, even with things like the unemployment rate having come down to 5.1, they've been able to take cover behind very anemic wage growth and the lack of transmission that's had into inflation, which has allowed them to stay with this very easy monetary policy.
Rick Karr
Does volatility in global markets play into this at all for the Fed? Or is it really just those two mandates, inflation and jobs?
Collin Martin
They're definitely taking that into consideration. For a while, we were in the camp that economic data was good enough for them to hike rates. When you looked at the declining unemployment rate, inflation, although below their target, kind of held steady. And committee members have been consistent with their message that they expect it to rise in the years to come.
But then we saw a lot of market volatility in August, global growth concerns, China, and then they didn’t raise rates in September. So it's clearly something that they're taking into consideration, not that they necessarily have a third mandate now. But it's something that they're being more explicit about. And they are definitely a little worried about rattling, you know, the financial markets. 
Rick Karr
What’re the specific metrics that the Federal Reserve is looking at as they make this decision? 
Liz Ann Sonders
Yeah. There are a whole bunch of various indicators that they look at. I think the inflation data's a little bit more straightforward.
But the jobs data is a little bit more not only nuanced, but there are a number of different metrics that is on the so-called Yellen dashboard of indicators that she looks at. It's not just the standard straight unemployment rate or job creation. But another one that they look at is the JOLTS data, Job Opening and Labor Turnover Survey.
They look within that at the quit rate, so not only how many job postings there are relative to the number of applicants, but also what percentage of workers are voluntarily quitting a job. And that ostensibly means you have confidence in getting another job. So that's a confidence measure. 
Rick Karr
When rates do rise, do either of you see anything coming that, maybe investors wouldn’t expect?
Collin Martin
One thing investors might not expect is how various fixed-income investments perform. Just to kind of look at some numbers, since the Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index—and that's a broad proxy for intermediate-term investment-grade bonds—since its inception in 1976, it's only generated a negative annual total return three times, in three different years, the most recent being 2013. And even then, that was only down 2 percent. So we think investors who are, you know, expecting massive declines are probably overreacting, and performance might not be as bad as you expect.
So our biggest takeaway is that you don't need to panic. We still think if you're in intermediate-term high-quality investments, you can still earn positive returns over the long haul. And if you're looking to get more invested in fixed income, this can offer some opportunities to invest in some higher-yielding assets than you've been used to over the past few years. So we always like to say, you know, it's more important to be invested in the market now than actually trying to time the best time to get in.
If we do expect it to be a slow and low rate cycle, with rates not going as high as some people are hoping for or as high as it's gone in the past, we think rather than waiting and waiting and waiting, we think it matters to stay invested.
We want all of our investors, all of our clients to be invested accordingly, based on their risk tolerance and their time horizon. So when the Fed does finally raise rates, the answer or concern should be, so what? It should be a nonevent. And everyone should be allocated accordingly now, not based on what's going to happen once they do do that.
Rick Karr
Collin Martin, thanks a lot for joining us.
Collin Martin
Thanks a lot, Rick.
Rick Karr
And Liz Ann Sonders, thank you.
Liz Ann Sonders
Thank you so much.
Rick Karr
Collin analyzes the bond market at Charles Schwab, and Liz Ann is Schwab's chief investment strategist. She's on Twitter at lizannsonders, L-I-Z-A-N-N-S-O-N-D-E-R-S. That's it for this installment.
The Insights & Ideas podcast is brought to you by Charles Schwab. You can find us on iTunes or go to Our producer is Matthew Nelson. I'm Rick Karr. Thanks for listening.

Important Disclosures

Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Please note that this content was created as of the specific date indicated and reflects the speakers’ views as of that date. It will be kept solely for historical purposes, and the speakers’ opinions may change, without notice, in reaction to shifting economic, business, and other conditions. 

The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The investment strategies mentioned here may not be suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decision. 

All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market, economic or geopolitical conditions. Data contained herein from third-party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed. 

Past performance is no guarantee of future results and the opinions presented cannot be viewed as an indicator of future performance.

Fixed income securities are subject to increased loss of principal during periods of rising interest rates. Fixed income investments are subject to various other risks including changes in credit quality, market valuations, liquidity, prepayments, early redemption, corporate events, tax ramifications and other factors.

Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs and expenses, and cannot be invested in directly.


Thumbs up / down votes are submitted voluntarily by readers and are not meant to suggest the future performance or suitability of any account type, product or service for any particular reader and may not be representative of the experience of other readers. When displayed, thumbs up / down vote counts represent whether people found the content helpful or not helpful and are not intended as a testimonial. Any written feedback or comments collected on this page will not be published. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. may in its sole discretion re-set the vote count to zero, remove votes appearing to be generated by robots or scripts, or remove the modules used to collect feedback and votes.