Download the Schwab app from iTunes®Close

High Hopes: S&P 500 Hits All-Time High Amid Pandemic/Recession

High Hopes: S&P 500 Hits All-Time High Amid Pandemic/Recession
Key Points
  • The S&P 500 completed its round-trip, taking out February’s high and cementing that a new bull market has been underway since the March low. 

  • Market breadth has been underwhelming; while the concentration of the largest five stocks remains a risk.

  • This was the fifth time in history that the market hit an all-time high while the economy was still in a recession. 

The stock market rally off the March 23 low is now “officially” a new bull market, courtesy of the S&P 500 having hit a new all-time high. It was the fastest recovery in history to a new high following a decline of at least 30% historically (the S&P was down 34% from February 19 to March 23; also the fastest move in history from an all-time high to bear market territory). The table below highlights all round trips for the S&P 500 in its history; along with their length, depth and recovery statistics.

082420_SP Round Trips Table

Source: Charles Schwab, Bespoke Investment Group LLC (B.I.G.), as of 8/24/2020. *20% decline from all-time high only reached on intraday basis.

Big tech not just tech

“Big tech” (how they’re generically compartmentalized) has been a powerful force. Rightly so, the dominance of the five largest stocks in the S&P 500 have received much investor attention (and buying pressure). In equal-weighted terms, they represent 1% of the S&P 500; but in cap-weighted terms, they now represent nearly their own quartile, as you can see in the chart below. Interestingly though, only two of them (Apple and Microsoft) are Technology stocks. Two of them (Google/Alphabet and Facebook) are Communication Services stocks, and one of them (Amazon) is a Consumer Discretionary stock. In fact, it’s actually the Consumer Discretionary sector that has the best performance since the March 23 low; with Technology a close second.

Top 5 Nearing Their Own Quartile

082420_SP Top 5 Stocks Market Cap

Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg, as of 8/21/2020.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

This cycle’s dominance by the top five stocks is outsized relative to past cycles. Following the past three major bear market lows, the five largest stocks did not perform as well as they have today, as you can see in the chart below.

Top 5 Performance Following Major Lows

082420_SP Top 5 and Bottom 495

Source: Charles Schwab, Strategas Securities LLC.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

The dominance by a small subset of stocks has also lifted Growth and Momentum; and in the case of the latter, it’s a continuation of a near-half century trend. According to SP Global/S&P Dow Jones Indices, the S&P Momentum Index (launched in November 2014) has gained more than 4.5x the price return of the overall S&P 500 index.

The dominance by “big tech” has also created a wide gap between the S&P 500 and its mid- and small-cap companion indexes this year—the S&P MidCap 400 and the S&P SmallCap 600—which are -6.4% and -11.5%, respectively. Interestingly, the Technology sector has not just been stronger, but also less volatile relative to most other sectors. Tech currently represents 7% of the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index—a larger weight than either of the traditionally-defensive Real Estate and Utilities sectors according to SP Global.

Top heavy

But concentration has its risks as well; particularly with regard to the relatively weak breadth statistics accompanying the March new all-time highs. As you can see in the first two charts below, the percentage of S&P 500 stocks above their 50-day and 200-day moving averages have rolled over in conjunction with the overall index hitting a new high. In addition, less than 10% of the S&P 500’s members are trading at a new 52-week high, as you can see in the third chart below.

S&P 500 vs. % > 50DMA

082420_SP Above 50d MA_YTD

Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg, as of 8/21/2020.

S&P 500 vs. % > 200DMA

082420_SP Above 200d MA_YTD

Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg, as of 8/21/2020.

S&P 500 vs. % at 52w Highs

082420_SP New 52w Highs

Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg, as of 8/21/2020.

These divergences are not only characteristics of the S&P 500; but of the NASDAQ as well, as you can see below. In fact, there is an even smaller percentage of NASDAQ stocks trading at new 52-week highs. Last Friday was a particularly unique day relative to history; with the NASDAQ hitting a new 52-week high; but only 29% rising on the day—the lowest reading in history (at least back to 1984), according to SentimenTrader. By the way, the next-lowest day came last month; so it’s not a brand new phenomenon.

NASDAQ vs. % > 50DMA

082420_NASDAQ  Above 50d MA_YTD

Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg, as of 8/21/2020.

NASDAQ vs. % > 200DMA

082420_NASDAQ Above 200d MA_YTD

Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg, as of 8/21/2020.

NASDAQ vs. % at 52w Highs

082420_NASDAQ New 52w Highs

Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg, as of 8/21/2020.

In the joint history of the S&P 500 and NASDAQ, there is no other five-month period when the S&P 500 was up more than 50% and the NASDAQ was up more than 65%. Whether these recent all-time highs will be followed with more of the same, represent “double-tops,” or something in between is yet to be seen. That said, it would be in keeping with history for at least some short-term consolidation—which could simply take the form of a rotation away from the concentrated leadership areas vs. something more sinister. Most historical studies of similar periods of concentration show a tendency for flat-to-lower stock prices short-term; but higher prices longer-term.

As it relates to the economic environment, the recent all-time high marked the fifth time in history when the S&P 500 hit an all-time high while the economy was still officially in a NBER-defined recession. The prior four times were in January 1961, July 1980, November 1982 and February 1991. In all four cases, the NBER declared the recession as having concluded within the subsequent month.

Irrationality vs. solvency

I worry about the signs of froth in the market and among some behavioral measures of investor sentiment; not to mention traditional valuation metrics that are historically-stretched. This is not an environment in which greed should dominate investment decisions; but instead one for discipline around diversification and periodic rebalancing. Momentum can power the stock market beyond fundamental supports; which is why John Maynard Kenyes’ view from the 1930s remains oft-quoted: “Markets can stay irrational longer then you can stay solvent.”

What you can do next

Bond Real Yields: What’s Happening Beneath the Surface

Important Disclosures:

The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The investment strategies mentioned here may not be suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decision.

All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market conditions. Data contained herein from third-party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed.

Examples provided are for illustrative purposes only and not intended to be reflective of results you can expect to achieve.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results and the opinions presented cannot be viewed as an indicator of future performance.

Diversification and rebalancing a portfolio cannot assure a profit or protect against a loss in any given market environment. Rebalancing may cause investors to incur transaction costs and, when rebalancing a non-retirement account, taxable events may be created that may affect your tax liability.

Investing involved risk including loss of principal.

Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs and expenses and cannot be invested in directly. For more information on indexes please see

©2020 Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. All rights reserved. Member SIPC.


Thumbs up / down votes are submitted voluntarily by readers and are not meant to suggest the future performance or suitability of any account type, product or service for any particular reader and may not be representative of the experience of other readers. When displayed, thumbs up / down vote counts represent whether people found the content helpful or not helpful and are not intended as a testimonial. Any written feedback or comments collected on this page will not be published. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. may in its sole discretion re-set the vote count to zero, remove votes appearing to be generated by robots or scripts, or remove the modules used to collect feedback and votes.