Download the Schwab app from iTunes®Get the AppClose

  • Find a branch
To expand the menu panel use the down arrow key. Use Tab to navigate through submenu items.

The Election’s Over, so What’s Next for Markets?

Click to show the transcript

MARK RIEPE: Hello and welcome to the Schwab Market Snapshot for November 14, 2016. I’m Mark Riepe, sitting in for Randy Frederick. Joining me this week is Liz Ann Sonders, our chief investment strategist. Welcome, Liz Ann.

LIZ ANN SONDERS: Thanks, Mark. And thanks for tuning in, everybody.

MARK: So, Liz Ann, we’ve seen markets on a bit of rollercoaster post-election, but not only that, during election night itself. What do you think were the factors that have been driving that kind of volatility?

LIZ ANN: Well, it was a wild ride, and most of it, actually, occurred overnight on election night. I think, in general, you could argue that the fact that the market sold-off in a knee-jerk fashion very, very quickly because of the surprise win by Trump—but then started to rally—is somewhat in keeping with what we’ve seen in history when you’ve gotten these crisis events or big surprises. Most recently being an example like Brexit. The fact that it was condensed in overnight and you didn’t even get to the open before the market had sort of found its level and picked back up, but that general pattern of a knee-jerk negative response and then a rally back, I think, reflects—unless these events turn into long, protracted economic negatives—the market has found stability in short order, and that was certainly the case this time.

MARK: So, clearly, the election has been dominating the headlines since last Tuesday, but longer-term factors like earnings and valuation are ultimately what drive stock prices. So as you survey kind of the post-election landscape, where do we stand on those sorts of fundamental factors?

LIZ ANN: Well, I agree with you. It seems like a long time ago where we actually cared a lot about fundamentals, we’ve been so focused on macro issues, geopolitical and otherwise. But the good news is, is even before the election, third quarter looked to break the string of what had been five quarters in a row where S&P 500 earnings were negative in year-over-year territory, and we moved back into the positive category in third quarter. And expectations for calendar year 2017 are pretty comfortably in double-digit return mode. Valuations, in turn, have improved, as well, because if you look at a traditional P/E ratio, when you have the E appreciating at the same time, also, price has been going up, but E has been going up—you actually have slightly better valuations.

Now, there is a risk looking into 2017, though. Part of this story that we’re all digesting here right now—and we’re certainly seeing it in the bond market—is a higher inflation outlook into 2017. And that does matter for valuations. The idea is that in low inflation, earnings are more valuable. So in a low inflationary environment, P/E ratios tend to be higher. When you start to see increasing inflation, earnings become less valuable, so P/E ratios tend to go lower. So that is something we have to be mindful of looking into 2017. That even if earnings growth stays fairly robust, if inflation picks up, the market may be less willing to pay those higher multiples.

MARK: So another big theme that’s been coming out of the election has been the ascendency of fiscal stimulus. Let’s assume for the moment that that becomes a reality in 2017. To what extent is that going to have an impact on, let’s say, the deficit, the economy and ultimately, the market?

LIZ ANN: So I think there’s no question it’s going to have an impact. If, as we’re spending a lot of time focused on now, if we do see a big infrastructure stimulus package, at the same time some of the tax cuts—either just on the corporate side or across the board, even on the individual side—those may be very good boost to the overall economy, but would unquestionable increase the deficit. The deficit is down to less than 3% of GDP, but as that starts to creep up again, given the fact that we’ve still got high debt and debt that is still rising—remember debt is a cumulative effect of running deficits—I think that may start to become a problem and may already be reflected in what we’re seeing with bond yields having picked back up. So I would expect to see the deficit hawks within government, and maybe also by market participants, start to squawk a bit more in 2017, as we look at the potential for a significant increase in the deficit.

MARK: Great perspective, as always, Liz Ann. That’s it for today. If you would like to hear more from Schwab, you can find our material at, or you can follow us on Twitter @SchwabResearch. You can also follow Liz Ann on Twitter. Her handle is @LizAnnSonders. I’m Mark Riepe. Randy Frederick will be back next week. Thanks for watching.

Important Disclosures

The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. Please note that this content was created as of the specific date indicated and reflects the author’s views as of that date. It will be kept solely for historical purposes, and the author’s opinions may change, without notice, in reaction to shifting economic, business, and other conditions.

Data contained herein from third party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed. Supporting documentation for any claims or statistical information is available upon request.

The election analysis provided by The Charles Schwab Corporation does not constitute and should not be interpreted as an endorsement of any candidate or political party.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results and the opinions presented cannot be viewed as an indicator of future performance.

Schwab Center for Financial Research (“SCFR”) is a division of Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

Charles Schwab & Co. Inc. is a subsidiary of The Charles Schwab Corporation.

Price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) is a company’s stock price divided by its annualized earnings.


Thumbs up / down votes are submitted voluntarily by readers and are not meant to suggest the future performance or suitability of any account type, product or service for any particular reader and may not be representative of the experience of other readers. When displayed, thumbs up / down vote counts represent whether people found the content helpful or not helpful and are not intended as a testimonial. Any written feedback or comments collected on this page will not be published. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. may in its sole discretion re-set the vote count to zero, remove votes appearing to be generated by robots or scripts, or remove the modules used to collect feedback and votes.