Download the Schwab app from iTunes®Get the AppClose

Choiceology: Season 2 Episode 2

use_simplecast_player

Listen on Apple Podcasts, Google PodcastsSpotify or copy to your RSS reader.

Why is it so tempting to make short-sighted decisions? And what we can do to exert more self-control?

In this episode of Choiceology with Katy Milkman, we look at a bias that has an outsized influence on decisions you make in the here and now.

  • The show begins with an experiment that reveals how difficult it is to avoid the temptation of junk food—and how the power of that temptation is affected by time.
  • Then, you’ll hear the story of a man who spent his childhood in relative poverty but found himself wealthy beyond his dreams by the time he was a teenager. This unexpected windfall changed his life in an instant. But it ultimately became a painful lesson on the dangers of living only for the present.

You’ll also hear from two heavyweights in the world of psychology and economics.

Finally, Katy Milkman offers additional tips to help you avoid the pitfalls of this bias: with behavioral tools such as temptation bundling and commitment devices.

Choiceology is an original podcast from Charles Schwab.

If you enjoy the show, please leave a rating or review on Apple Podcasts.

Click to show the transcript

Katy Milkman: Im Katy Milkman, and this is Choiceology.

Advertisements: Act now, and well throw in this stylish end table at no extra charge. And you dont pay until 2021. Zero percent financing on all 2019 models with no payments for 90 days. What are you waiting for? Call right now, and get your first order free.

Katy Milkman: Weve all been there. You spot a seemingly good deal on a thing you didnt even know you needed, but you feel compelled to act. You need that fancy banana slicer now! And the ad says that if you order today, youll get a bonus spork. Awesome! But whats actually going on here? Is this something you really need? Or is it an impulse-buy? Is cooking even your thing?

Why does the immediate reward of a small thing sometimes get in the way of bigger, more important things down the road? That urge to grab a candy bar on your way through the checkout line, probably gets in the way of your long-term diet goals. But maybe you do it anyway. Whats up with that? Were going to look at how our choices are influenced by the way we experience time: the here and now, and the future.

Advertisement: Youll wonder how you ever lived without it. Order now. Supplies are limited.

Katy Milkman: This is Choiceology, an original podcast from Charles Schwab. Its a show about the hidden forces that can affect your ability to make the best decisions. We look at everyday choices and high-stakes judgments, and we analyze them to help you avoid costly mistakes.

Weve gathered some unsuspecting victims together for a test, a battle of wills and willpower. Weve gone out into the world to test an idea about temptation and time.

Facilitator: Hello! How are you guys doing today?

So were asking the question, Given the choice between an apple and a chocolate bar, which would you eat right now?

Participant 1: Probably the chocolate.

Participant 2: Yeah.

Participant 3: Chocolate bar!

Facilitator: OK.

Participant 4: Id take a chocolate bar of some sort.

Participant 5: Two chocolate bars, please.

Facilitator: Given the choice between an apple and a chocolate bar to eat right now, today, which are you choosing?

Participant 6: Probably have to go with an apple.

Facilitator: OK. Go ahead and pick whichever one you want right now.

Participant 6: Ill have a chocolate bar.

Facilitator: So you would eat a chocolate bar right now?

If you were, say, planning for a snack to eat tomorrow, which one are you going to choose?

Participant 1: The apple.

Participant 3: Id take an apple for my lunch to go to work. Its healthier. I ate enough sugar today.

Participant 4: I think for tomorrow, I would take the apple.

Facilitator: And what if you had to choose between an apple and a chocolate bar for a snack to have tomorrow?

Participant 5: Id go for the Apple, I think.

Facilitator: And why do you think theres a difference between what you choose tomorrow and what youd have right now?

Participant 5: ’Cause the chocolates nicer and the apples healthier. So tomorrow Im trying to make a good decision for tomorrow, a healthier decision. But today, I just want to eat the chocolate.

Katy Milkman: Did you hear what happened there? People often made different choices depending on whether they were deciding for the present or the near future. Why is that? Ive got another example of this kind of behavior, and the stakes are a bit higher than choosing a quick snack at 2:30 in the afternoon.

Alex: Basically, my childhood experience was no love at home, no father figure, and pretty tough at school as well.

Katy Milkman: Alex had a tough childhood. He grew up in a suburb of Toronto. His father left when he was three. His mother was volatile, and prone to rage and neglect. And she was poor. At least thats what Alex thought.

Alex: She wouldnt really buy me anything ever. So I actually had a paper route from age five, very young, and I was actually saving up money. So if I wanted to get something, like even toys, Id have to buy them myself.

Katy Milkman: Alex was ostracized early on at school for his disheveled appearance and clothes.

Alex: I just got tormented a lot at school. Kids made fun of me. People would call me a loser. Almost all the kids didnt want to play with me at all. What I always wanted was friendship. I always just wanted to be accepted.

Katy Milkman: Imagine how hard this was for a kid. That difficult environment at home and lack of social support at school took a toll. Eventually, by the time he was a teenager

Alex: I was just like, Im done. Im not taking this anymore. So I took my clothes, and I just got out of there.

Katy Milkman: Alex ran away from home. He was 15 years old, and on the streets.

Alex: I just kind of survived. During that period, I would sometimes sleep on buses. Sometimes, I would sneak into maybe a laundry room in a building. Sometimes I remember once just sitting all night at a bus stop. This is during the winter too. The Canadian winter was brutal. So freezing, and literally moving my toes around because it felt like they were going numb.

Katy Milkman: The amazing thing is Alex stayed in school during this period.

Alex: So I was homeless, but I would still go to school, and then try and act like its normal, and act like Im OK and whatever. And its like you dont want to admit to anybody that youre homeless.

Katy Milkman: Alex turned 16 about a month after he left home. This meant he was eligible to work and live in a youth hostel, where he had a bed, three meals a day, and a five-dollar-a-day allowance.

Alex: Eventually, I got student welfare. It was enough to get a small basement apartment. So I kept going to school. I had my own place, and so I was independent from 16.

Then, one day, I was in a car with a friend of mine, and I get a phone call. And it was an old friend of my mothers that Id known since I was a kid, and she said, Hey, you know, I need to tell you something. Your mother is dead. She killed herself.

So I was absolutely shocked, surprised, and I wouldnt even say In that moment, I wouldnt even say sad. Youre just too shocked and in a state of disbelief to really process it, what that means.

Katy Milkman: Alex knew his life had changed, but he had no idea how big a change it would be. He received the keys to his mothers apartment.

Alex: So I just went to open the mail, and there was one bank account, and its got like half a million dollars in it. But it has her name and my name on it. So its already in my name. And then, I open another one, and it had, like, I dont know, 200,000 or so, maybe 250 British pounds. So it was like that much just in cash, just sitting in bank accounts thats already in my name. And I inherited about $1.1 million when I was 18.

Katy Milkman: Alex had gone from neglected child, to homeless teenager, to a millionaire.

Alex: When I actually started realizing the amounts, and I started opening these envelopes up, you just start flipping out. Youre happy, but youre also in a state of shock.

Katy Milkman: How did this happen? Where did his mother get all this money? And why hadnt she shared it before she died?

Alex: She came from the Soviet Union. She was poor. So when she started making decent money as a violinist and certainly, when she came to Toronto, she was earning 50 grand a year. Thats a fortune. And she didnt spend any of it.

Katy Milkman: All of a sudden, Alex had more money than hed ever seen before.

Alex: Being rich suddenly, it makes you feel really invincible, like absolutely on top-of-the-world invincible—and, in a way, superior. I literally thought I was better than other people. It really got to my head. And it really skews everything. It warps your sense of reality. Instant millionaire just makes you feel super. You feel super.

Katy Milkman: OK. This is probably a good moment to stop and ask yourself: What would you do in this situation? Imagine youd gone from almost nothing to a millionaire overnight.

Lets think about how this scenario relates to our snack experiment earlier. That experiment highlighted that were inherently impulsive, and lured by temptations. Instant gratification can take many forms: unhealthy food, going out for a wild night before an exam instead of studying, or spending money the minute you get your hands on it.

You can imagine in Alexs case that he would be tempted to spend a chunk of that million-dollar windfall right away. As a matter of fact, he went to town.

Alex: I remember spending money quickly, but I couldnt even tell you on what. You just dont think about it when you have that much money. For me, it was just like, OK, suddenly Im Mr. Cool. And man, it just completely went out of control.

I spent a lot of money on eating out, going to restaurants, quarter-million-dollar penthouse. I lent several friends between $20- and $50,000. One guy, I lent $100,000. Quite a bit on clothing, little bit of travel, a movie script. I got a producer credit for funding this movie. So there was a lot of 20, 25, 50K pops to just help somebody who I thought was my friend, and, of course, none of that money ever came back.

Katy Milkman: As you mightve guessed, this extravagant spending spree came to an abrupt and unhappy end.

Alex: Last time I checked, I had maybe 10,000 or something in my main account. And I hadnt checked in a while. I was kind of scared to look. And I thought, “OK, I better take a look. And I took a look. There was, like, 800 bucks or something. And I thought, This is it. This is it. Its over. Theres nothing left. And it just hit me, like, “OK. Thats it. Im about to be broke again.

Katy Milkman: Alex burned through his entire million-dollar inheritance in about five years.

Alex: When you grow up, and you just dont have anything, and suddenly, its like you have virtually unlimited money, and you can have anything. Man, its just a shortcut to feeling good. You spend money, just get whatever you want to. Its so instant. Its instant gratification. Theres no, like, Oh, its a bit expensive, or, Maybe its not a good idea. Youre just in heaven. Its like finally going to Disneyland.

Katy Milkman: Happily, Alex learned from his mistakes. He managed to pull himself back from the brink, and now has a successful career and some money in the bank.

Alex: I learned a lot about myself. That experience was a stepping stone for me, and it was extremely profound. And actually, even when it was happening, even when I blew all that money and it was all over, I knew deep inside, I knew that one day I would have money again, and that I would treat things very differently.

Katy Milkman: Alexs story isnt unique, at least in terms of the way he spent his money. Maybe youve heard cautionary tales like this before. There are quite a few stories out there about lottery winners, for example, who win millions, and, somehow, go broke within a year. And even though windfalls like these are relatively rare, these stories do highlight a tendency that we all have: a tendency to prioritize the present over the future.

Theres a good reason we do that. But before I explain, I want to give you another example. Actually, no. Ill let Noble Prizewinning economist Richard Thaler tell you a story from back when he was a junior professor.

Richard Thaler: I invited a bunch of economics graduate students over for dinner, and there was something cooking in the oven, and we were having an adult beverage, and I put out a large bowl of cashew nuts that we started nibbling on. And after 5 or 10 minutes, I realized that we were devouring these cashew nuts at a rapid rate, and that our appetites and waistlines were in danger.

And so I rudely grabbed the bowl of cashew nuts and went and hid them in the kitchen. And I came back, and everybody was happy. They go, Thank God you got rid of those nuts! We were going to eat them!

And then, since it was a group of economics graduate students, we immediately started analyzing what had happened, and we realized, Well, wait a minute. Were not allowed to be happy. Because the first principle of economics is that more choices are better than less. And before, we had the choice of eating nuts or not, and now we didnt. So were worse off, but were happy. How can that be?

And that got on my list of funny behavior that I should think about. And its, of course, an illustration of self-control problem, that we knew that if the nuts were there, we would eat more of them than we thought was best. But of course, the whole idea of eating more than you think is best is something that economists dont really permit. And this is one of these parts of economics that never gets written down, so theres nowhere in any textbook that it says that there are no self-control problems; instead, it just says, People choose to maximize their utility.

But in fact, we often make choices that we know were going to regret later, and this was kind of a small example, that we would have eaten more of those nuts then we wouldve chosen to eat. My mistake was filling the bowl too much. Of course, thats led to decades of research by myself and others on how to help people save for retirement, and it basically amounts to taking some part of the pay package, and hiding it in the kitchen where we cant spend it.

Katy Milkman: That was Richard Thaler, winner of the 2017 Nobel Prize in economics, and the co-author of the New York Times best-selling book Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness. Well hear more from Richard later in Choiceology in other episodes, but one thing he didnt do in that story was name this tendency to favor immediate small rewards, like a bowl of cashews right in front of you, over bigger, future rewards, like the dinner in the oven.

Theres actually a term for it, and its called present bias. Its basically the idea that people care too much about things that they can get or enjoy in the present relative to things theyll get, and have to wait for, in the future.

Richards dinner guests discounted the value of the future dinner, and overvalued the cashews that were right in front of them. The same thing goes for the people in our apples-and-chocolate experiment earlier. I actually showed in my own research that this happens in other settings too. It happens when people rent movies, for instance. Lots of us pick highbrow films, but then when the time comes to choose what to watch, we postpone watching those award-winning documentaries, and instead, we plow through lowbrow movie after lowbrow movie.

I want to get a bit deeper into this bias with my friend and colleague, Angela Duckworth. Angelas done some great research on the general topic of self-control failures and present bias.

Hi, Angela. Thank you so much for coming to the studio today.

Angela Duckworth: Hi, Katy. Its great to be here.

Katy Milkman: Angela, what do you find most interesting about present bias?

Angela Duckworth: I think the idea that human beings are so myopic is itself interesting. Though I think we should cut ourselves some slack because if we compare ourselves to other animals like squirrels, and dogs, cats, and even our nearest cousins, monkeys and orangutans, we are much more farsighted than other animals.

I think what makes the human condition so interesting is that we struggle with present bias. Were aware of present bias. It tortures us. We feel bad about skipping out on exercise because we can see ahead into the future. So yes, we have present bias, but we at least have, compared to other animals, enormous awareness of present bias. And that is a start.

Katy Milkman: OK. How does present bias change over a persons lifetime?

Angela Duckworth: When you look at very young children, right? Lets take babies. They are pretty much living in the moment. You dont see babies worrying about their retirement savings, for example. And then, when you progress through toddlers, and preschool, early elementary school, you can see that the time horizon is extending to the future. It is probably not the case that 50-year-olds are a whole lot more farsighted than 40-year-olds, but certainly throughout childhood and adolescence, there is this extension temporally into being able to see farther and farther into the future.

Now, that doesnt mean that we can always do something about it. For example, adolescence is probably the most impulsive period of life in a sense that adolescents know theyre doing stupid things, but theyre still doing them. So the idea that youre aware of the future doesnt guarantee that youre going to act in your future best interests.

Katy Milkman: So does that help explain why a teenager who inherited $1 million might spend it down very quickly?

Angela Duckworth: Adolescence is such a fascinating period. I mean, anybody who has a teenager, go ahead and roll your eyes with me because I have two. And teenagers are at their peak for reward sensitivity, and sensation-seeking. There is a kind of drive to do things that are novel, fun, exciting and pleasurable when youre a teenager that you dont have as strong at any other developmental period, it seems.

At the same time, your capacity to control yourself, your prefrontal-cortex maturity, the strategies you have to regulate your impulses, those are coming along, but theyre still developing. And thats why some people call adolescence the perfect storm because you have these strong impulses for immediate gratification and yet are still developing capacity to control those impulses.

Katy Milkman: So Angela, whats your favorite study on present bias?

Angela Duckworth: I really like studies that show how you can overcome present biasand overcome the fundamental human conflict that we all have between, Now, I can feel this good thing right away. It’s going to be pleasurable” versus Well, five minutes, a year, 10 years later, Ill be better off. So what can people do?

Really, the trick to self-control is to bring that gratification forward, not to delay gratification, but, in clever ways, to consume things in ways that are immediately pleasurable. And heres one example: Ayelet Fishbach at University of Chicago has shown that when you encourage people to think of something as important, important to their long-term future, you dont actually do as good a job at motivating them as when you encourage them to think about it as fun and enjoyable. She showed this with gym-goers, and the idea that if you could think about the thing youre about to do at the gym, that next piece of exercise equipment, how can you get the most fun or pleasure out of it? Actually, thats going to end up paradoxically benefiting you and your exercise habit in the long term.

Katy Milkman: So one way to avoid giving in to immediate temptation is actually to make whatever you know you should be doing tempting as well? To try to make that future value feel like something thats enticing right now?

Angela Duckworth: I think thats actually the secret to self-control. We can basically toggle our immediate experience in clever, strategic, tactical ways.

Katy Milkman: But its so hard to resist temptation.

Angela Duckworth: It was Oscar Wilde who said, I can resist everything, except temptation. And for many of us, we would say, Oh yeah. Thats exactly me.

Katy Milkman: Thats such a good quote. Thanks so much for taking the time to chat with me today, Angela.

Angela Duckworth: I loved it. Lets do it again.

Katy Milkman: Im Katy Milkman, and this is Choiceology, an original podcast from Charles Schwab. You might be wondering how cognitive and emotional biases can affect your financial decisions. Well, we have some help for you on that front. Check out our sister podcast, Financial Decoder. Its designed for people who want to make better decisions with their money. Mark Riepe hosts the show. Mark is the head of the Schwab Center for Financial Research, and he can help demystify some of the financial choices you might be facing so that youre better-equipped to avoid mistakes. You can find it at Schwab.com/financialdecoder or wherever you listen to podcasts.

So weve been talking about present bias and what a problem it is, but what can we do about it? How can we avoid making this mistake? Well, as Angela Duckworth mentioned, one strategy is to do whatever you know is in your long-term best interest in a way that actually makes it fun, and at least a little bit instantly gratifying. So if youre going to the gym, make it fun by going to a workout dance class with a friend. Dont use the most miserable calorie-burning machine you can find. If you can find a way to actually enjoy that thing now thats good for you, you might have a better chance of actually doing it.

There are a couple of other great solutions that have been well studied too. One is called future lock-in. It just involves making choices in advance that youll be stuck with when the future becomes today. For instance, one creative study by Eric VanEpps, Julie Downs and George Loewenstein showed that if people are required to order their lunch several hours in advance of eating it, they order healthier meals. Other research has shown that asking people to sign up to start saving or contributing to a charity in the future can increase contributions.

Another solution is using what economists call a commitment device. Commitment devices impose penalties or restrictions on you if you fail to achieve some future goal like eating a healthy lunch tomorrow. For instance, an alcoholic who takes the drug Antabuse, a drug that makes you feel sick if you even sip a drink, is using a commitment device. Alarm clocks are commitment devices for over-sleepers. Commitment devices prevent you from going back on your best intentions when the future becomes today by imposing serious consequences on your future-self for goofing, and, as a result, they can be a helpful fix for self-control problems. Just making commitment devices available has been proven to help smokers quit smoking and under-savers vastly increase their savings rates. So even though its really hard to avoid present bias, there are tools and strategies out there to help you manage itand to help shift some of the temptation of now into a more gratifying future.

Youve been listening to Choiceology, an original podcast from Charles Schwab. If youve enjoyed the show, leave us a review on Apple podcasts. It helps other people find the show. And while youre there, you can subscribe for free. Same goes for Google Podcasts and other podcasting apps. Subscribe, and you wont miss an episode.

Next time on the show, another psychological effect that causes you to run with the crowd even when it might not be in your best interest. Im Katy Milkman. Talk to you next time.

Speaker 1: For important disclosures, see the show notes, or visit Schwab.com/podcast.

Important Disclosures

All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market conditions.

Data contained herein from third-party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed.

Apple Podcasts and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.

Google Podcasts and the Google Podcasts logo are trademarks of Google LLC.

Spotify and the Spotify logo are registered trademarks of Spotify AB.

(1118-8P9W)

Thumbs up / down votes are submitted voluntarily by readers and are not meant to suggest the future performance or suitability of any account type, product or service for any particular reader and may not be representative of the experience of other readers. When displayed, thumbs up / down vote counts represent whether people found the content helpful or not helpful and are not intended as a testimonial. Any written feedback or comments collected on this page will not be published. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. may in its sole discretion re-set the vote count to zero, remove votes appearing to be generated by robots or scripts, or remove the modules used to collect feedback and votes.