Download the Schwab app from iTunes®Close

Borrowed Time: Final Rate Hikes And Stock Market Rallies

Borrowed Time: Final Rate Hikes And Stock Market Rallies
Key Points
  • Stock markets around the world have rallied after the Federal Reserve’s final interest rate hike of the economic cycle.  

  • History suggests that the stock market rally since the last Fed rate hike on December 19, 2018 may be on borrowed time.

Over the past 30 years, stock markets around the world have rallied after the Federal Reserve (Fed) hiked interest rates for the last time in the economic cycle. The rallies have varied in length and strength, but eventually break down as the late cycle environment encounters a catalyst that ends the cycle. The market currently believes that the Fed has hiked for the final time this cycle on December 19, 2018, according to the Fed Funds Futures. The stock market rally since then appears to be on borrowed time, if we compare it to past cycles.

Fed rate hike events table

*So far, 12/19/2018 is date of last Fed hike. Since then the MSCI World Index has rallied 15.1% to its peak that took place about five months later on 4/30/2019.
Data covers period since inception of MSCI World Index on 12/31/1969.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Source: Charles Schwab, Factset and Bloomberg data as of 5/27/2019.      

Let’s look back before we look to what may lie ahead. Following the last Fed rate hikes in the 1970s and early 1980s, stocks continued to slide. However, following the last rate hikes of the past 30 years, stocks rallied.

What changed?

Why did the market’s reaction to the final rate hike differ before and after 1989? The main reason may be that the public learned of them. The Fed’s public communication on rate changes began to shift during Greenspan’s first year as Fed chairman in 1988. At that time, the Fed began an era of greater transparency which lead to the communication of rate changes to the public, eventually including post-meeting statements and press conferences. 

Another reason may be that beginning with the Greenspan era, the Fed was less prone to raise rates during a bear market, due to a better understanding of the lags in rate movements, financial conditions, and economic impacts. In the early periods of May 1974 and May 1981, when the Fed finally stopped their rate hikes, global recessions and bear markets were already well underway. In contrast to later periods, when the Fed’s final rate hikes came before the peaks in the world’s economy and stock markets.

What to expect

Since the changes in communication and methodology made by the Fed, market peaks have come after the final rate hike—by 2 to 16 months. Following those last rate hikes, we saw further stock gains averaging 15% before an outside catalyst ended the rally. Interestingly, the MSCI World Index has posted a gain of 15% from what increasingly looks like the last Fed rate hike on December 19, 2018 to this year’s market peak about five months later on April 30, 2019.

Let’s take a look at the catalysts that ended each of the rallies that followed the Fed’s last rate hikes post-1988:

  • 1989: a real estate crash in Japan in 1989 was the catalyst and was followed by Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait in 1990 which led to a doubling of oil prices which helped to tip the global economy into a recession and bear market.
  • 2000: the start of the “tech wreck” when tech companies driving the market and economy were unable to meet lofty growth expectations was the catalyst causing those stocks to crash and undermine high consumer and business confidence, furthered in 2001 by the 9/11 attacks on the United States, resulting in a bear market and recession.
  • 2006: a surge in oil prices to near $100 (up from $50 in mid-January) and signs of a sharply worsening U.S. housing market that had been powering the economy was the catalyst. This was furthered in 2008 by the mortgage related string of financial failures, resulting in the Great Recession and bear market.

The catalysts were different each time, but the economic environment was vulnerable in each case to a shock that brought an end to both the economic and market cycles.


We often get the question, “What is the one thing that investors should be watching for that will cause the next bear market and recession?” History shows it isn’t a cause that marks the end of the cycle, it’s a catalyst. It’s a shock that precipitates the end of the cycle due to the prevalent vulnerabilities of a mature economic cycle. 

The potential shock from heightened trade tensions, given the affect they may have on confidence, capex, and financial conditions, comes at a vulnerable time for the global economy:

  • The widely-watched global manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index has fallen for a record 12 months in a row through April, as you can see in the chart below, and the preliminary May numbers released last week continued to weaken.

Global purchasing managers’ index

Global PMI up and down months

Source: Charles Schwab, Factset data as of 5/27/2019.

  • The composite leading index (CLI) from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), a well-known economic think tank, has fallen to 99.0—a threshold that in the past has marked the line between growth and recession for the world economy, as you can see in the chart below.

World leading economic indicator and global recessions


Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg data as of 5/27/2019.

  • The U.S. Treasury yield curve continues to flirt with inversion, as the yield on the 10 year note slips below the yield on the 3 month bill. Historically, this has acted as an indicator of a recession on the horizon.

Yield curve 

10-yr Treasury yield less 3-month Treasury yield

Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg data as of 5/27/2019.

The rally following the Fed’s rate hike in December may be encouraging to investors, especially after the sharp decline in stocks during the fourth quarter. It also isn’t unusual. The global economy may be vulnerable to a catalyst, like an escalating trade war, which could bring an end to the rally in the stock market. Fortunately, the trend in the degree to which the world’s stock markets move in sync with each other has fallen to near the lowest level in 20 years. The lower correlation enhances the potential risk-reducing benefits of diversification. For more insights, see the recent article: Diversification: Finally Back After 20 Years.

What You Can Do Next

3 Order Types: Market, Limit and Stop Orders
Was 2018 Really That Volatile?

Important Disclosures

The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The investment strategies mentioned here may not be suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decision.
All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market or economic conditions. Data contained herein from third party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results and the opinions presented cannot be viewed as an indicator of future performance.
International investments involve additional risks, which include differences in financial accounting standards, currency fluctuations, geopolitical risk, foreign taxes and regulations, and the potential for illiquid markets.  Investing in emerging markets may accentuate these risks.

The MSCI World Index captures large and mid-cap representation across 23 Developed Markets countries. With 1,632 constituents, the index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in each country.


Thumbs up / down votes are submitted voluntarily by readers and are not meant to suggest the future performance or suitability of any account type, product or service for any particular reader and may not be representative of the experience of other readers. When displayed, thumbs up / down vote counts represent whether people found the content helpful or not helpful and are not intended as a testimonial. Any written feedback or comments collected on this page will not be published. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. may in its sole discretion re-set the vote count to zero, remove votes appearing to be generated by robots or scripts, or remove the modules used to collect feedback and votes.